We're celebrating 10 Days of Membership! Today's Gift: $20 off your professional membership with promo 10DAYS20OFF
Training, policies and tools to help HR prevent and respond to harassment claims.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Develop your HR competencies and knowledge in-person in 12 U.S. cities or virtually.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Want a road map on how not to react to a successful applicant who announces her pregnancy immediately after receiving an offer letter? Look at the behavior of an employer in Florida that recently settled a legal claim on that issue.
In early 2015, Nicole Purcell applied for an entry-level position with brokerage firm Brown & Brown in Daytona, Fla. She successfully made it through multiple rounds of interviews, and the company offered her a job.
Upon receiving the offer, Purcell called the company's employee services coordinator to accept and asked about maternity benefits, announcing that she was pregnant.
Within 30 minutes of the call, the coordinator sent an e-mail to Purcell stating that the company was rescinding the job offer because it needed somebody in the position "long term."
Purcell filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). In July 2016, the EEOC filed a federal lawsuit on her behalf.
[SHRM members-only toolkit: Managing Equal Employment Opportunity]
The parties recently resolved their differences by entering into a two-year consent decree, with the company agreeing to pay Purcell $100,000 in damages.
Besides the payment term, the consent decree includes provisions requiring Brown & Brown to:
All of this could have been avoided had the company engaged in an interactive conversation with Purcell regarding any limitations she might have developed related to her pregnancy and whether any limitations that would have affected her ability to do her job could have been accommodated.
EEOC v. Brown & Brown of Florida Inc., M.D. Fla., No. 6:16-cv-1326-Orl-37DCI (consent decree signed May 3, 2017).
Professional Pointer: The moral of the story is clear, and the list of employer do's and don'ts is short:
Maria Greco Danaher is an attorney with Ogletree Deakins in Pittsburgh.
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more. Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies