New to HR? Templates, tools and development to make you a seasoned pro in no time.
Shawn Premer shows how doing the right thing for employees leads to positive business results.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
A Muslim employee's poor performance—resulting in a performance improvement plan (PIP) and a negative post-PIP evaluation—is not protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, according to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Ammar Alkhawaldeh began working as a functional scientist/functional leader for Dow Chemical Company in January 2008. In October 2009, his supervisor gave him a rating of 1 on his annual review, the lowest possible rating on a scale of 1-5. The supervisor also placed him on a PIP. Alkhawaldeh vigorously protested his rating with Dow, but the rating remained unchanged.
In November 2009, Alkhawaldeh made an internal complaint to human resources that his supervisor and one or more trainers made racially offensive comments to him based on his Arab descent, dark skin and being from Jordan and that his supervisor retaliated against him for complaining about the comments by placing him on a PIP. On April 2, 2010, while still employed with Dow, he filed his first Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charge, alleging discrimination in violation of Title VII. During the summer of 2010, Alkhawaldeh also sent an e-mail to the chairman and CEO of Dow claiming that he was the victim of retaliation.
[SHRM members-only toolkit: Managing Equal Employment Opportunity]
On July 6, 2010, Dow transferred Alkhawaldeh to a new group and placed him with a different supervisor. The new supervisor evaluated him for approximately two months before concluding that he was underperforming. Thereafter, consistent with company policy, Dow convened a committee to evaluate Alkhawaldeh's performance. The committee found, among other things, that he was insubordinate, lacked concentration and failed to demonstrate innovation, and did not seem to possess the basic mathematical and engineering skills for his position. On Oct. 30, 2010, Dow terminated him.
On Nov. 17, 2010, Alkhawaldeh filed his second EEOC charge, alleging discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII. After an investigation, the EEOC issued a letter of determination finding that Dow retaliated against him in violation of Title VII. Thereafter, he filed a lawsuit against Dow alleging discrimination and retaliation.
The trial court ruled in favor of Dow on Alkhawaldeh's discrimination and retaliation claims, and the 5th Circuit affirmed. A Title VII plaintiff must present evidence that he was treated less favorably than others outside of his protected class, the appeals court stated. Because Alkhawaldeh failed to identify at least one co-worker outside of his protected class who received a 1 rating and completed a PIP but was not fired, he could not prove that he was treated less favorably than other similarly situated employees.
In addition, the 5th Circuit held that no reasonable fact-finder could conclude that Alkhawaldeh would not have been fired "but for" his internal complaints. The appellate court found that he received the 1 rating in October 2009—one month before his alleged internal complaint. The court also found that the negative, post-PIP evaluation by Alkhawaldeh's new supervisor independently justified Dow's decision to terminate him.
Alkhawaldeh v. Dow Chemical Company, 5th Cir., No. 16-20069 (Mar. 15, 2017).
Professional Pointer: If an employee who falls in a protected class complains about unlawful discrimination and/or retaliation, an employer should promptly investigate the allegations, take remedial action as appropriate and consistently follow company policy with respect to taking any adverse employment action based on poor performance.
Jennifer L. Gokenbach is an attorney with Gokenbach Law LLC, the Worklaw® Network member firm in Denver.
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more. Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Talent Attraction Study: What Matters to the Modern Candidate
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies