Finally get that promotion? Get exclusive content, tips and tools to help you excel.
Implicit bias occurs when individuals make judgments about people based on gender, race or other prohibited factors without even realizing they’re doing it.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
As technology and the workplace change, so will wage and hour laws
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was enacted 80 years ago to improve working conditions in the United States. The law has evolved over the years, and more changes will come as businesses and workers adapt to the 21st century workplace.
Since its passage in 1938, the Fair Labor Standards Act has had—and continues to have—a remarkable impact upon the workplace through its requirements that employees be paid at least a minimum wage for all hours worked and overtime premium pay for hours in excess of 40 hours in a workweek, said Steven Pockrass, an attorney with Ogletree Deakins in Indianapolis, in an interview with
The FLSA initially established a 25-cent hourly minimum wage (now $7.25) and a 44-hour workweek (which was later reduced to 40 hours). The act also banned businesses from employing workers younger than 14—with some exceptions for agricultural and family businesses—and limited the types of jobs children under age 18 could perform.
"What we have to celebrate about the FLSA is the basic principle it established: If you work, you should be paid," said David Weil, the Department of Labor's wage and hour division administrator under President Barack Obama, at a symposium at Georgetown University Law Center in March.
[SHRM members-only toolkit: Complying with U.S. Wage and Hour Laws and Wage Payment Laws]
At the time the FLSA was enacted, it was a radical change for the government to set standards for private industry, said Richard Fiesta, executive director of the Alliance for Retired Americans in Washington, D.C.
In recent years, however, many state and local laws have become more generous than federal law. Employers need to understand—and comply with—all of the wage and hour laws that affect their workplace.
Today's Compliance Issues
While lawsuits and regulatory actions over the FLSA are common today, that hasn't always been the case. "Despite its long history, the FLSA has not always been a hotbed for lawsuits," Pockrass said. "Today, however, the plaintiffs' employment bar actively pursues FLSA collective actions, which have become a major source of potential exposure for employers."
HR departments should adopt technology to aid in their wage and hour compliance efforts, noted LaToi Mayo, an attorney with Littler in Lexington, Ky. Compliance tools can help with payroll audits and determine employee classifications.
Mayo recommended that employers pay particular attention to:
Today, employees often can perform work wherever and whenever they have an Internet or mobile phone connection, Pockrass said. "Well-crafted policies, training and enforcement are key steps to compliance."
In addition, job duties often change over time, so employers need to be vigilant in determining whether such changes have an impact on a position's exemption status, he added.
Predicting the future activities of Congress is difficult in and of itself, so trying to predict what new laws Congress may pass to change the FLSA is even more challenging, Pockrass said.
As the economy continues to evolve, he hopes to see a hybrid "independent contractor/employee" status created to accommodate the gig economy. There are efforts underway to amend the FLSA to recognize an "independent employee" or "intermediary employee."
Worker advocates, however, aren't so welcoming of a hybrid contractor/employee status. Technology will continue to change how work is done, but the reality is that most people still are in conventional work arrangements, said Christine Owens at the symposium. She is the executive director of the National Employment Law Project (NELP) in Washington, D.C. NELP is concerned about creating an intermediary standard between employee and independent contractor because employers may misclassify workers who are actually employees and should have the associated employment protections, she said.
NELP does support sector-based standards, however, for industries in which there are many independent contractors or where there may be high rates of misclassification, such as in the ride-share industry. "We need to experiment with approaches like that, but keep the focus on ensuring that everyone who works in this country earns a decent living and has safe working conditions," Owens said.
Another likely change on the horizon is an increase to the
FLSA's salary threshold for white-collar exemptions. In 2016, the Department of Labor issued proposed final regulations that would have increased the minimum salary level to $913 per week (from $455), but those regulatory changes were deemed invalid by a federal court.
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) supports an update of the salary level but one that follows previous methodology to achieve a more equitable increase. SHRM said the 2016 rule's salary increase of over 100 percent was too far and too fast and would have presented particular challenges for employers whose salaries tend to be lower, such as small employers, nonprofits, employers in certain industries and employers in certain geographic regions of the country that tend to have lower costs of living.
"There seems to be widespread agreement that a less-drastic increase in the minimum salary level is warranted, but we don't know when new proposed regulations or final regulations will be issued, or how such regulations will fare in the courts," Pockrass said.
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more. Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
HR Education in a City Near You
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies