Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
SHRM board member David Windley discusses how unconscious bias can derail workplace diversity efforts.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Staffers had faced a maze of red tape and delays before they could file lawsuits
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
The House of Representatives passed a bill on Feb. 6 to make it easier for congressional staffers to file harassment claims. The chamber also passed changes to its rules to protect harassment victims on Capitol Hill. We've gathered articles from
SHRM Online and other respected media outlets on the proposed legislation and rules change.
Currently, an employee with a harassment complaint must go through an intake legal counseling process with the compliance office for up to 30 days. Then, the staffer must go through 30 days of mandatory mediation, which may be extended. After that, there's a 30-day "cooling off period" before the staffer may sue.
All parties are bound by an agreement to keep confidential all communications, statements and documents that are prepared for mediation.
For the victim, it feels like "you against Congress and you're not going to win this fight," so the victim settles, said a spokeswoman for Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif. Then the government, not the accused member or staffer, pays the victim, so there's no accountability, she added. (SHRM Online)
[SHRM members-only HR Q&A:
What are the different types of sexual harassment?]
Immediate and Proposed Changes
Four changes take effect immediately in the House:
If the bill passes the Senate and is signed by President Donald Trump, legislators would have to pay harassment claims out of their own pockets, not with taxpayer money; legal counseling and mediation would not be required; the cooling-off period would be scrapped; and victims who settle would not have to sign nondisclosure agreements. (Chicago Tribune)
Numerous Lawmakers Have Left Office After Allegations
Many legislators have stepped down due to harassment complaints. Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., resigned in January following allegations from several women that he groped them and one woman that he forcibly kissed her. Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., resigned after a member of his staff said he had asked her to carry his child in exchange for $5 million. Among other examples, Rep. Patrick Meehan, R-Pa., announced he would not seek re-election in light of news reports that he settled a harassment claim with a former aide. (The Washington Post)
Ethics Office Constrained?
One provision in the bill has been criticized as a threat to accountability. Complaints would be referred only to the House Ethics Committee for review; the Office of Congressional Ethics, an independent watchdog agency, would not be able to investigate on its own. The intent is to streamline the review process. A Public Citizen lobbyist said the ethics office "must remain a strong, independent check within Congress and we remain committed to fighting against any weakening of the office's power." (The Hill
Bill's Supporters Answer Critics
The bill's co-sponsors said the Office of Congressional Ethics' role would be limited because it would be duplicative to have the office involved. Each claim in which an award or settlement is made would be referred to the House Ethics Committee. The Office of Congressional Ethics has no subpoena authority and can't do any investigation, so the watchdog agency would have to refer any award or settlement to the Ethics Committee anyway, Speier said. (CNN)
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more. Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Choose from dozens of free webcasts on the most timely HR topics.
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies