This Month Only! >> $20 off and a FREE SHRM tote with your membership and code TOTE2018!
Sign up for free email newsletters and get more SHRM content delivered to your inbox.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
A Senate committee voted 12-11 on July 19 to advance President Donald Trump's nominees, William Emanuel and Marvin Kaplan, for two vacancies on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
The nominees must still be confirmed by a full vote of the Republican-controlled Senate. If confirmed, Republicans will hold three seats and Democrats will hold two seats on the five-member board, giving Republicans their first majority on the board in nearly a decade.
The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., said he hopes the nominees will restore balance to the board. "After years of playing the role of advocate, the board should be restored to the role of neutral umpire," he added.
Emanuel is a management-side attorney with Littler in Los Angeles. He is also a contributing editor to a leading treatise on the National Labor Relations Act, The Developing Labor Law (Bloomberg BNA, 2012), and has served on an NLRB advisory committee regarding agency procedures.
Kaplan serves as counsel for the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and previously served as workforce policy counsel for the House Education and the Workforce Committee.
[SHRM members-only HR Q&A: What is the function of the NLRA?]
The nominees were supported by Republicans and opposed by Democrats who raised concerns about their pro-management positions. Both candidates took a little heat from Democrats at the confirmation hearing on July 13, noted James Plunkett, an attorney with Ogletree Deakins in Washington, D.C.
During the July 19 session, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said she had serious concerns about their records of "undermining workers and putting corporate interests first." She said the middle class is strengthened by unions that give workers the ability to stand up for themselves and that lately the scales have been tipped too heavily toward those at the top. A strong NLRB is critical to rebuilding the middle class and putting workers first, she added.
Plunkett told SHRM Online that Emanuel and Kaplan will likely be confirmed by the full Senate with a party-line vote.
Donald Schroeder, an attorney with Foley & Lardner in Boston, also thinks it's highly likely that both candidates will be confirmed. He pointed out that lawmakers have a strong desire to fill these vacancies and make sure there is a full board. "There has been so much controversy over the last few years without a full board," he said.
If Emanuel and Kaplan are confirmed, how will the new Republican majority shape NLRB decisions? Schroeder said he expects the board will undo some Obama-era rulings, but that this will take time.
Plunkett and Schroeder said that there are three major issues that most employers and labor attorneys are watching:
Employers may also be looking for decisions on class-action waivers in employment arbitration agreements, Plunkett said. The Democrat-controlled NLRB opposed such waivers, asserting that they infringe on employees' right to engage in concerted activity. Federal appeals courts have reached different conclusions on the matter, and the U.S. Supreme Court will soon weigh in. It will be interesting to see if the board quickly revisits the issue, Plunkett noted, adding that the board would have to find a case with the right facts and circumstances and can't just issue a declaratory opinion on the matter.
It's also likely that the new board will have a more restrictive view of what constitutes protected concerted activity on social media, Schroeder noted.
"I think we're going to see a real change in the direction of the NLRB, but ... it's not going to happen overnight," he said.
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more. Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Choose from dozens of free webcasts on the most timely HR topics.
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 10,000 companies