Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
HR professionals share their advice for minimizing worker stress and boosting retention.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Virtual SHRM-CP/SHRM-SCP Certification Prep Seminars kick off September 12 and fill up fast!
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader. Join us in Phoenix, AZ | OCTOBER 2 - 4, 2017
A dozen years ago, California's passage of Assembly Bill 18251 began required sexual harassment prevention training for supervisors in companies with 50 or more employees.
Since then, California has led the nation in the scope and depth of required sexual harassment training for private-sector supervisors and managers.
New bills passed in 2016 expanded the scope of required sexual harassment training to an estimated 570,000 additional private-sector workers, the vast majority of whom will be rank-and-file, non-supervisory employees.
Earlier this year, new regulations took effect that were aimed at clarifying employers' already-existing obligations to prevent and correct harassing conduct in the workplace.
More recently, California enacted provisions requiring three categories of employers to institute sexual harassment training for employees.
As summarized below, new training requirements have been imposed to cover property services workers (janitors), farm laborers and local government agency officials.
The California Legislature suggested that janitorial and agricultural employees remain vulnerable to sexual harassment and assault due to their frequently isolated working conditions or their inability to complain effectively of harassment without fear of reprisal. Employers in these industries should familiarize themselves with the new requirements and prepare for compliance.
California farms typically employ over 350,000 workers a year, with most these workers supplied by labor contractors. California recently revised Labor Code section 1684, governing the licensing of farm labor contractors, to add training requirements for contractors, their supervisors and all of the contractors' agricultural employees. Amended section 1684 took effect on June 27, because this amendment was made part of the annual budget bill, which becomes effective when signed by the Governor.
As amended, Section 1684 provides that farm labor contractors may not obtain or renew their licenses unless they satisfy several conditions:
Property Services Staff
California has approximately 220,000 persons working in the property services industry. Unlike the farm laborer training requirements, the new law mandating anti-harassment training for janitors, passed as AB 1978, is not effective immediately. Rather, the law imposed the training requirements by first establishing a registration and recordkeeping process for janitorial employers.
This registration requirement mirrors the regulations already imposed on other industries that operate predominantly through contracting and subcontracting, such as farm labor contractors and garment manufacturers.
Beginning July 1, 2018, janitorial employers must register with the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) annually, and they cannot continue to conduct business without complying with that obligation.
The act also requires employers to make and keep records with basic employee data for three years, including names and addresses, daily hours worked, wage information and other conditions of employment.
DLSE can revoke registrations in certain circumstances. DLSE also will maintain on its website a public database of registered property service employers.
Once the registration requirement takes effect in 2018, all covered employers must educate their employees about the unlawfulness of sexual harassment and how to combat it. Initially, employers will need to give employees a copy of a pamphlet addressing the subject.
Meanwhile, DLSE will create an in-person sexual violence and harassment prevention training program. DLSE will convene an advisory committee to help develop the program, by July 1, 2017. DLSE must propose the required elements of the training on or by Jan. 1, 2018, and must formally establish the program's standards by Jan. 1, 2019.
Both employees and employers must complete the sexual violence and harassment prevention training every two years.
Effective Jan. 1, 2020, janitorial employers seeking new or renewal registrations must satisfy this training requirement.
These expanded requirements for training managers and employees in sexual harassment prevention suggest that the legislature may continue to expand mandatory training of this kind to other groups of employees in other fields.
The responsible agencies have yet to determine the requirements for delivering the training. Accordingly, employers in the affected industries will have to remain flexible and innovative in their approaches to accomplishing the required training objectives, particularly for employees.
Employers will need to assess the most appropriate training method for their workforces.
Some employers may be able to use large-scale, in-person training, perhaps broken up into time segments.
Other employers may be able to use online training, assuming a significant enough portion of their affected workforce has access to a computer.
Still other employers may choose to adopt a manual training approach in which the individuals read through and certify completion of written materials.
Alternatively, a blended solution might turn out to work best—one in which several training approaches are used.
Kevin O'Neill is an attorney with Littler in San Francisco. Marissa Dragoo is an attorney with Littler's Sacramento, Calif., office and Christopher E. Cobey is an attorney with Littler's San Jose, Calif., office. © Littler. All rights reserved. Reposted with permission.
California HR Newsletter:
The California HR e-newsletter is a free monthly newsletter that provides the top California HR and employment law news, including updates on state and federal court decisions and analysis of state legislation and regulations. Subscribe
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies
[/_catalogs/masterpage/SHRMCore/Main.master][Title][SHRM Online - Society for Human Resource Management]