We're celebrating 10 Days of Membership! Today's Gift: $20 off your professional membership with promo 10DAYS20OFF
Training, policies and tools to help HR prevent and respond to harassment claims.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Develop your HR competencies and knowledge in-person in 12 U.S. cities or virtually.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Law would require employers to make auto-deposits into retirement savings accounts
(Editor's Note: Brown signed S.B. 1234 on Sept. 29.)
California lawmakers passed a bill on Aug. 31 that would require certain private-sector employers to arrange for automatic payroll deposits into employee retirement savings accounts.
The bill will create savings accounts for workers whose employers don't offer a pension, 401(k) or other retirement savings option, said Mark Beach, associate state director of communications for AARP California.
States Encourage Savings
California is just one of many states exploring ways to encourage workers in the private sector to save for retirement.
Over 30 states have introduced bills, enacted legislation or at least conducted studies on state-sponsored programs, Benko said, but many have been taking a "wait-and-see approach" to implementation.
"The programs typically apply to employers that don't offer any other retirement plan," Cabral said. Key considerations are keeping administrative burdens on employers to a minimum and making it clear that the employer will not be a plan fiduciary.
"Although [state] bills seek to keep employer burdens to a minimum, certain tasks such as enrollment, withholding and transmittals will fall on the employer," Cabral said.
Regarding the California bill, Parker said the immediate impact on HR professionals will be record-keeping. They will have to spend time deciding who's responsible for developing and distributing informational materials, he said.
The more overarching concern, if issues arise, is whether the employer is going to be held as a responsible party, Parker noted. It may become crucial for the HR professional to show that an employee was provided enough information to make an informed decision about whether to opt out of the program.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Five key facts about High-energy visible (HEV) a.k.a. “blue light”
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies