Finally get that promotion? Get exclusive content, tips and tools to help you excel.
Shawn Premer shows how doing the right thing for employees leads to positive business results.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
Assembly Bill 3438, introduced on June 23, 2014, would bar employers from taking any adverse actions based on a person’s legally authorized consumption of medical marijuana. The proposal contains an exception for employers who can show, by clear and convincing evidence, that the person’s authorized use of medical marijuana has had or would have a significant detrimental impact on that person’s job performance.
A different exception applies in the case of discharges. If an employer discharges someone in connection with their authorized use of medical marijuana, under this proposal the company would have to show clear and convincing evidence that the employee could not have reasonably been transferred to another position in which its authorized use would not affect job performance.
The proposal defines the term “adverse employment action” to include refusing to hire, discharging, requiring retirement, or discriminating in compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.
Rep. Linda Stender, who introduced the legislation, told NJ.Com that the proposal responds to patients who claim the program has failed them, particularly parents with severely ill children, and people whose diseases are not recognized by the state. According to the media, the program was serving 2,342 patients as of mid-June.
The bill is currently before the Assembly Committee on Health and Senior Services.
Diane Cadrain is an attorney who has been writing about employment law issues for more than 20 years.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies