Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
SHRM board member David Windley discusses how unconscious bias can derail workplace diversity efforts.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
Gov. Susana Martinez’s administration recently sent warnings of possible disciplinary action to more than 200 state employees who appear to have taken paid election leave but failed to vote in last November’s election.
Potential disciplinary action may range from a reprimand to suspension, according to the state.
The alleged problem surfaced when the State Personnel Office performed an audit, cross-referencing state employees’ Social Security numbers with those in voter databases kept by the Secretary of State’s Office. Audit findings indicated that of the roughly 4,600 state employees who used the paid voting leave, 243 appear to have taken the paid leave without actually voting; 42 of those who took the paid leave were not even registered to vote.
State employees are entitled under state law and personnel rules to take two hours of paid administrative leave to vote. However, Justin Najaka, personnel office interim director, said that employees should use the leave for its intended purpose. "We have a responsibility to be accountable to the taxpayers,” he added.
A similar audit conducted after the 2010 general election resulted in 721 letters being sent out to workers who allegedly had taken leave but failed to vote; 221 of those workers allegedly were not registered to vote. This year’s reduced numbers are “a significant improvement,” Najaka noted.
Several unions representing state workers, including the Communications Workers of America and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, have expressed concerns that some employees have been wrongfully accused of not voting. They have urged the state to do a thorough investigation before imposing discipline.
The state’s letter to employees states that they have 11 days to prove they used the leave for voting purposes. If an employee fails to respond or can’t prove that the time was used to vote, a copy of the letter will be placed in the employee’s file and two hours’ pay will be docked. Further discipline will be decided on a case-by-case basis, Najaka said.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Apply by March 23
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies