Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
The raw emotions of a polarized electorate are taking a toll on employee relations. How can HR promote peace?
Is your employee handbook ready for the New Year? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Get the HR education you need without travel expenses or time out of the office.
Elevate Your Talent Strategy. Join us in Chicago, IL – April 24-26, 2017.
The Ohio employment discrimination statute may be in for substantial changes. A bill aimed at comprehensive reform of Ohio's employment discrimination statute (R.C. § 4112) has been introduced in the Ohio Legislature.
Key provisions in H.B. 2 would amend R.C. § 4112 to:
A similar bill was introduced in the Ohio Senate in 2016, but that one lapsed at the end of the legislative session.
Significantly, H.B. 2 would revise the definition of "employer" under R.C. § 4112 to exclude individuals acting in their employer's interest. This revision would eliminate individual liability for managers and supervisors and move Ohio in line with federal law.
H.B. 2 also proposes a substantial reduction in the statute of limitations for employment discrimination claims brought under Ohio law. Currently, employees can bring employment discrimination claims under Ohio law up to six years following the occurrence of the alleged incident. H.B. 2 would reduce this to 365 days for all employment discrimination claims.
In addition, the bill would modify Ohio law on age discrimination claims. Under Ohio's current statutory scheme, age discrimination claims are handled differently than claims related to other protected classes, such as race and gender. The proposed legislation would consolidate age discrimination claims with other types of employment discrimination claims to equate age to other protected classes.
Another key provision of H.B. 2 would alter the interaction between administrative claims and civil lawsuits. Currently, employees can file charges of discrimination with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission while concurrently pursuing a lawsuit in state court. The proposed legislation would prohibit these types of duplicative legal proceedings by requiring employees to choose between filing an administrative charge or a civil lawsuit.
The legislation proposes other changes, such as the creation of an employer affirmative defense to vicarious liability in some hostile work environment cases and encouraging the use of alternative dispute resolution in the administrative process.
The bill was introduced in the Ohio House on Feb. 1 by Representative William Seitz (R-Cincinnati). H.B. 2 was referred to the Committee for Economic Development, Commerce, and Labor, but has not yet been scheduled for a vote.
The changes proposed by H.B. 2 would substantially affect employment discrimination law in Ohio.
Patrick O. Peters and Stephen R. Beiting are attorneys with Jackson Lewis in Cleveland. © Jackson Lewis. All rights reserved. Reposted with permission.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies