Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
Make sure supervisors know these common justifications for harassment are unacceptable.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
60+ new SHRM Seminar dates in 10 U.S. cities and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader -- Join us in Phoenix, AZ, October 2-4, 2017.
A healthcare staffing service that refused to hire an HIV-positive applicant for a position that involved sitting with patients at a U.S Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility will pay $75,000 and offer equitable relief under a consent decree with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
Maxim Healthcare Services Inc. made a conditional offer to the job candidate contingent on completion of a health status certification. Maxim later refused to hire him after receiving his medical evaluation, which noted his HIV-positive status but also stated that he was medically cleared to work, the EEOC alleged. The EEOC did not allege any participation by the VA in Maxim's decision to refuse to assign the candidate because of his HIV-positive status.
After trying unsuccessfully to reach a voluntary pre-litigation settlement through a conciliation process, the EEOC filed suit in federal district court in Pennsylvania alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
In addition to the $75,000 in monetary relief, the three-year consent decree resolving the lawsuit provides that:
*Maxim is permanently enjoined from engaging in disability discrimination or retaliation.
*Maxim will create, enforce and disseminate a policy prohibiting disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, and implement a complaint procedure designed to encourage employees to come forward with complaints regarding violations of its policy against discrimination, harassment, and retaliation.
*Maxim will provide training on the ADA and revise its "Health Status Statement Form" to prevent the inadvertent disclosure of medical information.
*Maxim will report to the EEOC regarding its compliance with the consent decree and post a notice about the settlement.
EEOC v. Maxim Healthcare Services Inc., d/b/a Maxim Staffing Solutions, W.D. Pa., Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00338-MRH (Dec. 4, 2014).
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies
[/_catalogs/masterpage/SHRMCore/Main.master][Title][SHRM Online - Society for Human Resource Management]