Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
SHRM board member David Windley discusses how unconscious bias can derail workplace diversity efforts.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
As the 2017 legislative session closed in Illinois, Gov. Bruce Rauner vetoed several measures relating to labor and employment issues. He rejected a statewide minimum wage increase, for example, as well as a ban on salary history inquiries. Illinois employers should be aware, however, that the governor's veto is not the end of this legislative roller coaster ride.
Indeed, the General Assembly recently convened its override session and revived the potential amendments to the state's equal pay law, along with numerous other bills. During this brief session, lawmakers have the opportunity to take another look at popular bills that died on the governor's desk and to vote on whether to circumvent his vetoes.
If the vote in both chambers supports a bill by a supermajority, the bill becomes law despite Rauner's prior veto. To successfully override a veto in Illinois, three-fifths of the members of each chamber (that is, both the house and the senate) must consider and pass the bill.
This session, lawmakers have revisited a couple of noteworthy labor and employment bills that Rauner had rejected. The first measure (S.B. 1905), known as the "Collective Bargaining Freedom Act," would have prohibited municipalities from enacting right-to-work ordinances. Rauner has long been a proponent of right-to-work laws, which generally make it unlawful to require employees to join a union or to pay union dues as a condition of their employment. Under S.B. 1905, only the state General Assembly would have the authority to adopt a right-to-work measure—an unlikely outcome given that the legislature is predominantly Democratic and union-friendly. Although the senate garnered enough support to override the veto of S.B. 1905, the maneuver fell short in the house, by one vote. The bill's sponsors have vowed to try again during the second half of the override session next month.
Rauner also vetoed a measure amending the existing equal pay act. If enacted, this bill (H.B. 2462) would have bolstered equal pay provisions and prohibited salary history inquiries. Specifically, H.B. 2462 would make it illegal to screen applicants based on their wage or salary history or to require that an applicant's prior wages satisfy any minimum or maximum criteria. The bill would also prevent employers from requesting that an applicant disclose his or her prior wages or salary as a condition for being interviewed, being considered for employment, being hired or receiving an offer of compensation.
Notably, H.B. 2462 would prohibit employers from asking any current or former employer of a candidate about that individual's pay history. This restriction would not apply for wage information about an applicant: (1) that is a matter of public record under the Freedom of Information Act; (2) that was posted by the current or former employer to comply with state or federal law; or (3) that is otherwise included in a document made public by the current or former employer. This limitation also would not apply to current employees seeking a different position with the same, current employer.
In addition to the ban on salary history inquiries, H.B. 2462 makes it unlawful for employers to demand that employees sign a contract or waiver that would restrict an individual's ability to disclose or discuss his or her wages. This proposal thus broadens the current statute's wage transparency provision, which prohibits employers from discharging or discriminating against anyone who asks about, discloses, compares or otherwise discusses employee wages. Finally, H.B. 2462 authorizes aggrieved employees to recover compensatory and punitive awards, as well as injunctive relief and special damages of up to $10,000. The equal pay act further provides for civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation, per affected employee.
In vetoing H.B. 2462, Rauner emphasized his support for wage equality and encouraged the legislature to model the Illinois equal pay act after its Massachusetts counterpart. The Illinois house voted to override that veto, however, sending it to the senate for reconsideration. When the senate initially voted on May 30 to pass the bill, it received 35 votes in favor. To achieve an override, 36 votes will be needed. While it is unclear whether the bill's proponents can muster the necessary votes, legislative override of H.B. 2462 is a real possibility. If the override succeeds, Illinois will become the latest jurisdiction to enact a salary history ban, joining California, Delaware, Massachusetts and Oregon, along with New York City and San Francisco.
The override session is scheduled to conclude on Nov. 9. Employers in the Land of Lincoln should stay tuned for further developments.
Darren Mungerson is an attorney with Littler in Chicago. Betsy Cammarata is a legal writer with Littler in Kansas City, Mo. © Littler. All rights reserved. Reposted with permission.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Become a SHRM Member
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies