Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
HR professionals share their advice for minimizing worker stress and boosting retention.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Virtual SHRM-CP/SHRM-SCP Certification Prep Seminars kick off September 12 and fill up fast!
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader. Join us in Phoenix, AZ | OCTOBER 2 - 4, 2017
India's new sexual harassment law is now more than three years old. And that should serve as a reminder to start the process to change the members of your Internal Complaints Committee (ICC).
India's Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013 (Sexual Harassment Act) was notified in December 2013. The law has been a catalyst in creating greater awareness of the issue of sexual harassment at the workplace. It has also given huge confidence to female employees to report any adverse incidents. Progressive employers on their part have gone to great lengths to implement the law, not just in form but also in spirit.
The Sexual Harassment Act requires the employer to constitute an ICC at every office location having a minimum of 10 employees. The law prescribes the details on how the members of the ICC need to be nominated by the employer based on their seniority, experience and familiarity with issues relating to sexual harassment.
The law allows the Presiding Officer and other members of the ICC to hold office for up to 3 years. Assuming most employers set up their ICC in or after December 2013, as per the Sexual Harassment Act, its time they initiate the process of replacing the members of their ICC.
Accordingly, in the next couple of months, employers should identify and start training the new members. The training should be in terms of the provisions of law, requirements of the employer's anti-harassment policy and charter, investigation process and timelines, manner of collecting and documenting evidence, ways of examining the parties (including witnesses), drafting the report and its conclusion, types of penalties that may be levied, etc. Employers should also focus on helping their new members develop soft skills in terms of dealing with the complainant and the respondent. To the extent the existing ICC has undergone a training programme, a similar initiative should also be extended to the new members. Subject to complying with confidentiality obligations, the employer may also request the existing ICC to include the new members as 'observers' in some of the ongoing matters being investigated by the ICC, as part of their training.
But this change is unlikely to be an easy process. While some employers and their ICCs are still getting familiar with the requirements of the Sexual Harassment Act, its already time to change the members. In a way, the process followed by employers in December 2013 will need to be repeated.
Some of the questions that are likely to arise while implementing the change are:
All answers may not be easily available at this stage. There may also be a need to consider some of these questions on a case-by-case basis given the sensitivities involved. At the end of the day, while taking any decision, employers must ensure that the intent and principles of the Sexual Harassment Act are adhered to and the interest of women remains secured at all times. Incidentally, the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court of India in 1997 in the case of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan did not prescribe such a three year period and hence these questions did not arise previously.The Bombay High Court has recently ruled that it would not interfere with an order of punishment passed by the ICC in relation to a sexual harassment complaint, unless the order is shockingly disproportionate. This judgment reaffirms the importance and powers of the ICC that is required to be formed under the Sexual Harassment Act. Given the sensitivities surrounding sexual harassment allegations, it is important that the ICC is trained to deal with such cases in a fair, proper and dispassionate manner and based on the principles of natural justice. It is also necessary for the ICC to ensure that it completes the investigation and issues its order within the time frame set under the law.This judgment also clarifies the already enshrined principles of judicial restraint by the courts. The interference of the courts should be limited to ensuring that there are no procedural irregularities or violations of principles of natural justice. Once the ICC has adequately and appropriately addressed a complaint of sexual harassment, it is not open to the courts to look into the merits of the matter.This time though, employers are not alone - the government, on its part, faces similar issues and questions as mentioned above. Members of the Local Complaints Committee set by up the District Officers in each district, are also subjected to the same timeline of 3 years. About the Author: Vikram Shroff is the leader of HR Law, Nishith Desai Associates and SHRM's Subject Matter Expert for Industrial Relations. He may be reached at Vikram.Shroff@nishithdesai.com. Views are personal.
 Vidya Akhave v. Union of India and Ors. (Writ Petition 796 of 2015)
 For more information, please refer to our legal alert: http://www.nishithdesai.com/information/news-storage/news-details/article/workplace-sexual-harassment-complaint.html
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Become a SHRM Member
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies
[/_catalogs/masterpage/SHRMCore/Main.master][Title][SHRM Online - Society for Human Resource Management]