Three days probably isn’t enough. Three years is probably too much. Somewhere between these two extremes may lie the sweet spot for leadership development programs designed to meet the needs of today’s organizations and their employees.
It’s a challenging environment. Talent pipelines are thinning as 73 million Baby Boomers approach retirement. Organizations are struggling to find or mentor leaders to handle the growing demand. And leaders are being asked to navigate complexity that textbook solutions can't address.
Shortening the Timeframe to Fill Leadership Pipelines
The challenge isn't new, but the urgency is. For years, organizations have offered leadership development programs that extended for months or even years. In an environment where AI is accelerating business change faster than even the most agile teams can respond, the luxury of long timelines is no longer an option.
The good news: organizations don't need to compress long training programs into overly dense, short programs. Instead, they need to start thinking of leadership development differently, said Charise Reid, CHRO at North Carolina Central University.
“I believe we can absolutely accelerate leadership readiness by giving high-potential leaders meaningful stretch assignments, executive coaching, cross-functional exposure, and real-time feedback tied to measurable business outcomes,” Reid said. “Leadership development should be embedded in the work, reinforced through coaching, and measured by changes in decision-making, influence, accountability, and organizational results rather than course completion.”
It’s a sentiment echoed by others who point to new opportunities to deliver leadership development opportunities that go beyond theory, textbooks, and case studies.
Instilling Accountability
Organizations that are able to successfully compress their leadership development programs into shorter timeframes do so by creating urgency, focus, and accountability, said Daniel Burrus, a strategic advisor to Fortune 500 company executives and a futurist speaker on global trends.
Burrus emphasizes that urgency in leadership development must be "baked in" from the start. "If it isn't seen as urgent, it will not happen," he said. He structures fast-track development around three principles: urgency, results-driven outcomes tied to executive initiatives, and focusing on the higher levels of cognitive domain (analysis, problem-solving, and synthesis) rather than memorization.
Burrus's three-principle, Anticipatory Organization learning system breaks delivery into bite-sized, microlearning modules: 3.5 to 4.5-minute videos focused on a single concept, followed by application questions tailored to each leader's role. AI assists in personalizing responses based on company size, industry, and function. Facilitators then bring teams together, either in person or virtually for distributed organizations, to apply learning to live business initiatives. According to Burrus, the ability to see results after each module along the journey is a big value-add. “Participants don't have to wait to complete all modules to end up getting benefits."
After completing a module, leaders must report to the CEO on how they've applied what they learned and project the related impact on revenue forecasts at 12, 24, and 48 months down the road. Success is measured not by course completion, but by results achieved.
The Measurable Difference
It’s important for organizations to focus on measuring outcomes, not participation, said Reina Ohol, senior VP of Human Resources, North America for Sonepar, a distributor of electrical products. Ohol uses a 70-20-10 model as a guide. Most learning happens through experience and real challenges,” she said. Coaching provides feedback; classroom training is the smallest component.
"HR organizations tend to look at course completions as a measure of success," Ohol observed. "Completing a class doesn't necessarily mean someone is ready to lead. The KPIs that matter are business outcomes: engagement, retention, internal mobility, promotion readiness, and team performance." When development translates into better decisions, stronger relationships, and a more capable team, the investment is working, she said.
Paul Comfort, the former CEO of the Maryland Transit Administration and a county administrator who ran turnarounds at two Maryland county governments, offers concrete proof that this type of approach works. Early in his career, at age 22, he was handed a $250,000 transportation budget with no formal training. He taught himself the books and by 26 had built a system named the National Community Transportation System of the Year.
Comfort said that organizations that take 36 months to develop leaders are running a curriculum, not development. Real responsibility and real metrics can compress that timeline to months and allow for measurement. His approach is focused on providing real-world challenges that real leaders face. For instance: Handing emerging leaders a real profit and loss (P&L) in month one, not year three; assigning each developing leader exactly one KPI; making individual accountability clear (when multiple people are responsible, no one is). Doing this, he said, will let organizations know within a single quarter whether leaders are moving the needle.
That kind of focus requires a shift from transferring knowledge to transferring the ability to apply sound judgment.
Leadership Effectiveness = Sound Judgment
“Leadership is too often viewed as a set of competencies versus what it really is: the ability to exercise sound judgment under uncertainty," said Joe Sagrilla, transformation consultant and faculty member at UT Austin’s McCombs School of Business.
He recommends making mentoring a leadership responsibility, not a volunteer activity. This means having structured decision debriefs where experienced leaders explain their reasoning, not just their decisions, investing in executive coaches who challenge thinking in real time, andusing AI to capture how experienced leaders make decisions.
"AI can accelerate knowledge acquisition, personalize coaching, and create practice scenarios," Sagrilla said. "What it cannot do is develop courage, judgment, credibility, or trust."
Reid agrees that critical thinking remains crucial. “No amount of training can replace the judgment gained from navigating difficult employee relations matters, leading through conflict, making unpopular decisions, or rebuilding trust after organizational change,” she said. “Organizations can shorten the path to leadership readiness, but they should not confuse readiness with mastery.”
The goal isn’t to produce leaders faster but to build leaders who create value while they grow, advised Reid. “[Effective organizations] are shifting away from lengthy, curriculum-based programs and toward continuous development through coaching, peer learning, executive sponsorship, and experiential assignments,” Reid said.
Organizations that outperform over the next decade won't simply be the ones that shorten programs. They'll be the ones that stop treating leadership development as a program at all.
Lin Grensing-Pophal is a contributing writer and business journalist.
Was this resource helpful?
Validate your HR expertise
Earning your SHRM-CP credential makes you a recognized expert and leader in the HR field.
Related Content
Learn how Marsh McLennan successfully boosts staff well-being with digital tools, improving productivity and work satisfaction for more than 20,000 employees.
The proliferation of artificial intelligence in the workplace, and the ensuing expected increase in productivity and efficiency, could help usher in the four-day workweek, some experts predict.
As artificial intelligence technology continues to develop, the demand for workers with the ability to work alongside and manage AI systems will increase. This means that workers who are not able to adapt and learn these new skills will be left behind in the job market.