Editor's note: Posts published on From the Workplace are written by outside contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SHRM.
Artificial intelligence is no longer an innovation pilot. It is embedded into recruiting platforms, performance systems, workforce analytics, learning tools, and daily workflows. For HR leaders, the conversation has shifted from “Should we adopt AI?” to “How fast can we scale it?” On the surface, the gains are real.
A June 2025 global workplace study reported by GlobeNewswire found that employees who use AI daily report higher job satisfaction and greater optimism about their careers. Increased efficiency reduces friction. Tasks that once consumed hours can now be completed in minutes. Employees feel capable and future-ready.
And yet, the same study found that those workers report up to 20% higher stress levels. More satisfaction. More stress. This is the paradox HR leaders must now manage.
Productivity Is Expanding. So Are Expectations.
As output becomes easier, expectations rise. When drafting, analyzing, or sourcing talent becomes faster, performance standards shift upward. Efficiency creates capacity, and that capacity is quickly filled.
SHRM’s 2025 workplace mental health research shows that nearly one-third of U.S. employees report frequent stress at work, with workload cited as a primary driver. AI may reduce task friction, but it does not automatically reduce pressure. In many cases, it accelerates it. For C-suite leaders, this is not a soft issue. It is a sustainability issue. If AI increases capability but organizations fail to recalibrate expectations, employees experience what researchers are increasingly calling "technostress" — the strain created by continuous adaptation, cognitive overload, and blurred work/life boundaries.
A June 2025 article in THE Journal, "AI’s Productivity Gains Come at a Cost," highlights how AI adoption can intensify workload demands even as it improves efficiency. Research published in Frontiers in Public Health this year further found that AI-related technostress is associated with anxiety and emotional strain, particularly when recovery time diminishes. In other words, AI may optimize workflows, but it cannot override human biology.
Why This Matters for CHROs
For CHROs, the risk is cumulative. Chronic cognitive overload reduces decision quality. Sustained stress erodes engagement. Blurred boundaries weaken retention. High performers, especially those most capable of leveraging AI, are often the first to feel the pressure of rising expectations. If organizations measure success solely by productivity gains, they risk amplifying burnout while celebrating efficiency.
The competitive advantage in the AI era will not belong only to the most automated organization. It will belong to the organization that can sustain human performance inside acceleration. That requires intentional culture design.
From Productivity to Human Sustainability
The solution is not slowing AI adoption. It is pairing technological acceleration with human regulation. This is where happiness habits enter the strategy conversation. Happiness habits are small, evidence-informed behavioral practices that support stress regulation, focus and resilience. They are not morale boosters or surface-level engagement tactics. They are capacity-building tools.
For HR leaders, this means:
- Encouraging structured recovery between high-cognitive tasks.
- Training managers to normalize boundaries rather than reward constant availability.
- Measuring sustainable performance, not just output velocity.
- Embedding micro-practices that strengthen connection and psychological safety.
When employees feel regulated, their cognitive flexibility improves. When they feel connected, collaboration strengthens. When they feel supported, retention stabilizes. AI expands what we can do. Happiness habits protect how well we can continue doing it.
The Strategic Question
The question for leaders is no longer whether AI will increase productivity. It already has. The question is whether organizations will evolve their people strategy at the same pace as their technology strategy.
As boards push for efficiency and shareholders track performance metrics, HR has a critical voice in ensuring that human sustainability is not treated as secondary. It is foundational. If we ignore technostress, we risk building high-output systems that quietly deplete the very talent we depend on. If we address it, we create workplaces where performance and well-being reinforce each other rather than compete.
AI is reshaping the workplace. HR leaders have the opportunity—and responsibility—to shape how it feels to work within it. The future of work will be defined not just by creating smarter systems, but by whether we were wise enough to protect the humans operating alongside them.
Alexia Georghiou, founder of the Knoxville Happiness Coalition, is a voice for well-being-driven leadership in the age of AI.
Was this resource helpful?
Validate your HR expertise
Earning your SHRM-CP credential makes you a recognized expert and leader in the HR field.
Related Content
Learn how Marsh McLennan successfully boosts staff well-being with digital tools, improving productivity and work satisfaction for more than 20,000 employees.
The proliferation of artificial intelligence in the workplace, and the ensuing expected increase in productivity and efficiency, could help usher in the four-day workweek, some experts predict.
As artificial intelligence technology continues to develop, the demand for workers with the ability to work alongside and manage AI systems will increase. This means that workers who are not able to adapt and learn these new skills will be left behind in the job market.