Editor's note: Posts published on From the Workplace are written by outside contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SHRM.
At no point in history have recruiters had more access to AI-driven tools, talent intelligence platforms (TAPs), or candidate relationship management (CRM) tools. Yet, ask any talent acquisition (TA) professional how their team is doing, and you’ll likely hear: We are drowning in volume. The 2026 AI in Hiring report from Greenhouse shows application volume has roughly tripled since 2021. AI tools were marketed as a way to improve operational efficiency.Instead, this has led to a serious ethical crisis that needs immediate attention.
The HR tech industry has fallen into a self-feeding algorithmic trap. By applying "technological solutionism" to each stage of the hiring funnel, we haven’t just eliminated essential friction; we have manufactured an AI arms race that is breaking the social fabric of recruitment.
Here is how the modernized HR tech stack cannibalizes the hiring process, and what industry leaders can do to stop it.
Phase 1: The Broadcast and the Dragnet
Traditionally, sourcing candidates required intentional, bespoke relationship-building, which acted as an essential friction to attract and identify high-signal talent. Today, this friction has been replaced by programmatic broadcasting. With a single click, highly sophisticated and integrated applicant tracking systems broadcast job postings to hundreds of boards, while aggregators index hundreds of thousands of jobs daily, causing a flood of applications at the top of the funnel.
Simultaneously, AI-driven CRMs continuously scrape the web to build millions of candidate profiles and set up automated multistep drip outreach campaigns. We have turned passive candidate sourcing into an industrial dragnet. Ultimately, candidates are bombarded with artificially personalized spam, causing them to develop a natural algorithmic immunity and instinctively tune out, while the surge of unvetted, high-volume inbound candidate summaries swamps TAs.
Phase 2: The Algorithmic Filter
It is humanly impossible for TA professionals to increase their throughput to match the enormous growth in application volume. They have no choice but to seek help from automated AI gatekeepers to filter the mess the first AI created.
To filter candidates, TAPs assign a “Match Score” based on millions of data points. But as recent investigations have shown, the hyper-optimized screening algorithms often mimic hiring managers’ historical preferences, and in doing so, neutralize their own diversity considerations.
Phase 3: The Extractor
Despite the algorithmic filter, the sheer volume of candidates requires further automation. We have introduced one-way AI video assessments, eliminating the traditional TA-candidate connect to assess candidate flexibility, adaptability, communication, and personality traits.
Candidates must now optimize not only their verbal responses but also their facial expressions, background lighting, glasses, and makeup to perform for a machine. These data points feed into the algorithm to calculate a “Competency Score.” By stripping away the initial human dialogue to achieve efficiency, we neutralize the very essence of mutual assessment — the candidate cannot assess their own fit initially.
Escaping the AI Arms Race
We are rapidly approaching a reality of "bot-to-bot" recruiting, where a candidate's AI applies to a company's AI, which screens and conducts an initial assessment before handing off to the hiring manager. The recruiter merely manages the software rather than the people.
To rebuild a functional hiring funnel, HR leaders must shift their mindset from autonomous decision-making to augmented intelligence.
- Retain Human in the Loop: Is your TA making the decision to reject or progress a candidate, or are they following the AI’s proposed disposition? Retaining a human-in-the-loop will mitigate algorithmic bias and restore human engagement for a mutual fit.
- Reintroduce Essential Friction: Are your success metrics focused on application volume or quality of hire (like employee tenure)? Not all friction is bad. Stop optimizing for volume and start optimizing for candidate intent. A smaller pool of high-signal, engaged candidates is more manageable and fruitful than a dragnet of hundreds of passives.
- Audit for Alienation: Are your database candidates responding to your outreach? Evaluate your automated CRM drip campaigns and one-way AI video assessments. Are they actually engaging the passive talent, or are they creating a sterile, hostile candidate experience?
The champions in the recruiting race won’t be those with the widest algorithmic nets, but those who leverage technology to give back recruiters’ time, allowing them to focus on the most important thing that AI cannot do: build mutual human relationships.
Sankit Gupta is a Technology Consultant at Delta Systems and Software Inc. and former Product Strategist for Indeed who researches how automated systems and "technological solutionism" are reshaping the workplace.
Was this resource helpful?
Validate your HR expertise
Earning your SHRM-CP credential makes you a recognized expert and leader in the HR field.
Related Content
Transform HR with mobile technology to streamline workflows, enhance communication, and boost employee engagement across distributed teams.
A new study found that talent development practitioners believe performance-based assessments are more effective at measuring employee learning outcomes than knowledge tests.
As AI makes deeper inroads into organizations, employee concerns about the technology continue to grow. Here's how HR leaders can address the fear of AI among their own staff, as well as in the wider organization.