Accenture has agreed to pay $25 million to settle U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) allegations that the consulting giant used race and sex to influence hiring, promotions, and professional development opportunities — the latest major enforcement action targeting corporate inclusion and diversity (I&D) practices.
The settlement resolves allegations that Accenture Federal Services (AFS), along with Accenture plc and Accenture LLP, violated the False Claims Act by certifying compliance with anti-discrimination requirements attached to federal contracts while allegedly engaging in race- and sex-based employment practices from 2017 to the present. Of the $25 million settlement, approximately $11.6 million is designated as restitution.
Accenture denied the government’s allegations, and the settlement does not constitute an admission of liability. The company said it cooperated with the investigation and chose to resolve the matter to avoid the costs and resources associated with prolonged litigation.
DOJ Targets Hiring and Promotion Practices
According to the DOJ, AFS tracked the racial and sex composition of individual business units and compared those figures against internal demographic goals. Monthly reports used a green, yellow, and red system to indicate whether representation had reached, approached, or fallen below those targets.
The government alleged those metrics went beyond simply measuring workforce demographics and instead influenced employment decisions. For example, the DOJ alleged AFS undertook entry-level hiring in 2020 and 2021 partly to make progress toward racial representation goals.
Promotion decisions also came under scrutiny. According to the DOJ, candidates for managing director who would advance the company’s race or sex demographic goals were separately discussed to give them additional visibility with decision-makers. Some candidates were color-coded during promotion reviews, and AFS allegedly maintained a separate pipeline of potential candidates who could advance demographic goals.
The DOJ also alleged that eligibility for some mentoring, training, leadership development, and educational programs was restricted by race or sex. One program, Amplify to Elevate, allegedly reserved participation based on race between August 2022 and February 2025.
Part of a Broader Enforcement Push
The settlement is not an isolated development. The DOJ launched its Civil Rights Fraud Initiative in May 2025, directing the department to use the False Claims Act against federal contractors and funding recipients that allegedly certify civil-rights compliance while engaging in unlawful discrimination. False Claims Act liability can carry significant penalties, including treble damages.
Accenture is the third major consulting or technology company to reach a settlement under that initiative this year. IBM paid approximately $17 million in April to resolve similar allegations, while Deloitte agreed in August to pay $21.5 million. Neither settlement involved an admission of liability.
The enforcement push comes amid a broader shift in federal I&D policy. President Donald Trump issued an executive order in January 2025 revoking the decades-old Executive Order 11246 affirmative-action framework for federal contractors and directing agencies to combat what the administration deems unlawful private-sector discrimination.
What HR Should Know
For HR leaders, the Accenture settlement underscores the distinction between tracking workforce demographics and allowing protected characteristics to influence individual employment decisions.
Title VII prohibits employers from discriminating based on race or sex in hiring, promotions, compensation, training, and other terms and conditions of employment. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has specifically warned that I&D programs may violate Title VII when race, sex, or another protected characteristic influences an employment action or determines access to opportunities such as training, mentoring, sponsorships, or candidate slates.
Federal contractors face an additional concern: employment practices can now create False Claims Act exposure if the government contends that a contractor falsely certified compliance with applicable anti-discrimination requirements.
Employers reviewing I&D programs should therefore examine not only formal policies but how demographic targets, dashboards, promotion pipelines, mentoring programs, and hiring directives actually operate in practice — particularly whether protected characteristics affect who receives an employment opportunity.
Was this resource helpful?
Validate your HR expertise
Earning your SHRM-CP credential makes you a recognized expert and leader in the HR field.
Related Content
Learn how Marsh McLennan successfully boosts staff well-being with digital tools, improving productivity and work satisfaction for more than 20,000 employees.
The proliferation of artificial intelligence in the workplace, and the ensuing expected increase in productivity and efficiency, could help usher in the four-day workweek, some experts predict.
As artificial intelligence technology continues to develop, the demand for workers with the ability to work alongside and manage AI systems will increase. This means that workers who are not able to adapt and learn these new skills will be left behind in the job market.