A deceptive career trend is quietly reshaping recruitment dynamics: "NATO applicants." This term refers to individuals who apply for jobs without any genuine intention of following through.
The “NATO applying” trend borrows from the common dating behavior among Gen Zers, where people date without fixating on the outcome. Now, employees are searching for jobs with this same mindset, applying to companies without being invested in the outcome.
“NATO applying” is understood to be a protective strategy for risk-averse candidates to build resilience and not get affected emotionally in case a rejection happens. Beyond that, it may also help them explore options and test their marketability.
However, from a recruitment and organizational standpoint, “NATO applying” can have potentially damaging implications. This blog discusses how.
What is “NATO” Applying?
Workplace trends are increasingly reflecting contemporary dating behaviors. Phenomena like job ghosting, career catfishing, and now “NATO applying” have become common in hiring. “NATO Applying” stands for No Attachment To Outcome, a protective strategy where employees apply to companies and go through the hiring process without being attached to the outcome.
A few reasons driving the “NATO applying” trend include:
Trust loss due to widespread layoffs and return-to-office (RTO) mandates.
Burnout from constant rejection.
Lack of response or closure from employers.
Highly competitive job markets with low success rates.
Over-automated hiring systems that feel impersonal.
“NATO applying” may prevent candidates from being emotionally affected if things don't work out in their favor.
Beyond that, it can also be seen as an opportunity for career cushioning (ensuring backup job options in case of a layoff or unexpected termination). By applying to multiple jobs, employees may test their marketability and build connections for the future. If the response from hiring teams is positive, employees may feel confident about switching roles or negotiating higher pay.
How Employers Can Address “NATO Applying” Behaviors
The number of job seekers applying to multiple roles with detached and less committed mindsets is becoming more common. Given the recent layoffs, the lack of predictability of job markets may be a key reason for rising “NATO applying” behaviors among job seekers. Implementing strict RTO mandates, despite promises of flexible work arrangements, may be another driving factor for employees considering employers solely for the short-term benefits rather than the long-term ones, be it compensation, learning and development, or perks.
For employers, this lack of commitment spells difficulties in hiring.
Firstly, employers may find it harder to identify truly interested candidates.
Secondly, the employees they hire may not be as committed or engaged, increasing the risk of turnover.
In the long term, low engagement can lower morale, decrease collaboration effectiveness, and affect overall productivity. Employees, too, run the risk of reduced performance and engagement if they aren't invested or committed to their roles.
Employers can reduce the impact of the “NATO applying” workplace trend by
Encouraging open conversation with employees.
Honest and authentic communication is necessary to build tighter connections with employees and identify scope for possible career growth and development. Companies must foster empathetic leadership that supports teams and reinforces trust.
Investing in building trust in employer-employee relationships.
Developing a culture where employees feel empowered with appreciation, support, and recognition is key. Employees who feel valued and recognized for their contributions will likely be more engaged.
Inspiring employees by reiterating the company's mission and showcasing its impact.
Stories and reviews from existing employees that give insight into an employer's meaningful strides in solving key challenges can ensure a high-potential talent inflow.
Conclusion
“NATO applying” reflects how employees view the job market and their emotional safety at work. Reinforcing purpose, prioritizing authentic connections, and building a culture of trust and value are all critical steps to reduce the impact of “NATO applying.” The more empathetic, supportive, and facilitating leaders and managers are of employees' long-term goals and expectations, the more secure workers may feel in their careers and finances, curbing trends like “NATO applying” and quiet quitting.
Was this resource helpful?
Validate your HR expertise
Earning your SHRM-CP credential makes you a recognized expert and leader in the HR field.
Related Content
Transform HR with mobile technology to streamline workflows, enhance communication, and boost employee engagement across distributed teams.
A new study found that talent development practitioners believe performance-based assessments are more effective at measuring employee learning outcomes than knowledge tests.
As AI makes deeper inroads into organizations, employee concerns about the technology continue to grow. Here's how HR leaders can address the fear of AI among their own staff, as well as in the wider organization.