Employee engagement and retention remain a top priority for leaders, as disengagement figures continue to rise in India. Companies are experimenting with a range of strategies, initiatives, and policies to improve workplace dynamics. Not long ago, there were elaborate office redesigns, known as “office peacocking,” to engage in-office employees. Recently, “workplace perks,” or what employees dismiss as “anti-perks,” have been emerging.
“Anti-perks” are employee benefits that offer little to no value to employees, despite their potentially desirable nature. In fact, some might look at them as disincentives to accept a prospective role. Common examples include open floor plans, game rooms, game boards, coffee capsules, nap pods, meditation rooms, massage parlors, and company-sponsored social events, among others.
This article examines “anti-perks,” why employees consider them undesirable, and what employee benefits they would rather have in their place.
What are “Anti-Perks?”
“Anti-perks” are benefits that employees could do without. Unlimited vacation days, ping-pong tables, on-site gyms, and free in-office meals; these might sound well-intentioned, exciting, or even generous, but don't add real value to employees’ personal and professional lives.
Game rooms might sound fun, but they don’t help much if employees are too busy to take a proper lunch break. Wellness apps may not make a big difference if the real problem is that the company is not supporting employee growth.
Other common “anti-perks” include in-house cafes, self-care amenities, etc.
Common Examples of “Anti-Perks”
There's usually a hidden motive behind “anti-perks,” such as indirectly creating unrealistic expectations or diverting attention away from pervasive workplace issues or job dissatisfaction. The following are a few examples of anti-perks and the counterproductive results they produce:
Unlimited vacation days make employees anxious about taking time off, fearing judgment. Employees might take fewer days off than they would in the absence of unlimited vacation days. This perk is often cited as a policy workaround to avoid paying out accrued paid time off upon an employee’s termination.
Perks like free meals, on-site gyms, nap pods, relaxation rooms, and other on-site services and amenities can sound considerate. However, they may cause employees to unintentionally spend longer hours in the office beyond their regular work hours.
Other “anti-perks” could include those that force social connection, such as company-sponsored social events, regular team-building activities, and gaming rooms that offer a variety of amenities, including game boards, as well as tennis or ping-pong tables.
Some even view hybrid work arrangements as “anti-perks” when there is a lack of clarity over work schedules. Employees may feel compelled to be available at all times and hybrid or remote settings may have the counterproductive effect of eroding work-life balance rather than promoting it.
Wellness apps and programs may give the impression that companies care about their employees’ well-being. However, if there are no concrete steps to fix the root causes of well-being issues like stress, anxiety, or burnout, such initiatives have little value.
What Benefits Employees Want Instead
There’s no shortage of exciting perks, but there are very few meaningful employee benefits. Many employees may be willing to trade a long list of “anti-perks” for fewer, more meaningful benefits, such as location-agnostic work (working from your preferred location), company-led coaching, progressive leave policies (extended maternity leaves, flexible time off, etc.), or better work-life balance.
Here are the top workplace perks and employee benefits that truly matter to employees:
The majority of employees prefer having the flexibility to choose where they work from. Surveys have consistently shown that workers value flexible work arrangements, such as remote work and 4-day workweeks.
Progressive leave policies, including paternity leave, paid mental health days, pet leaves, bereavement leaves, as well as flexible leaves for women navigating miscarriages, perimenopause, or menopause, or employees with caregiving responsibilities, may be more desirable and sought after.
Employee benefits, such as better health insurance for employees and their families, or retirement planning assistance, may be more welcome.
Financial planning assistance or resources can help employees manage overlapping financial obligations, debts, and other related issues.
Employees also seek cultural benefits when considering roles, such as continuous learning cultures that enable development and progression, inclusive cultures that foster a sense of community, and risk-taking cultures that drive innovation.
Conclusion
When employers design their employee benefits strategy, an important consideration must be made. Perks that appear employee-friendly may not necessarily be meaningful or value-driven. Employers should shift focus away from seemingly desirable perks (open office layouts, nap pods, meditation rooms, and mandatory fun days) to more value-aligned benefits that employees genuinely care about (flexibility, purpose alignment, coaching, higher salaries, etc.).
Was this resource helpful?