Even as Pride Month draws to a close, the workplace issues it highlights do not disappear on July 1. Employers continue to face evolving legal obligations related to gender identity, while also considering broader questions of workplace civility, respect, and inclusion. Although recent federal actions have generated uncertainty about the scope of protections available to transgender employees, organizations should not mistake enforcement changes for a green light to disregard workplace respect and professionalism.
In fact, legal compliance may be only part of the equation. Employers that focus solely on whether a particular action is technically lawful risk overlooking the broader cultural and business consequences that can arise when employees feel disrespected or excluded.
Legal Protections Continue Despite Policy Changes
The legal conversation surrounding gender identity shifted significantly in early 2026 when the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) rescinded its 2024 harassment guidance. The guidance had stated that repeated, intentional misgendering and denial of access to bathrooms consistent with an employee’s gender identity could contribute to an unlawful hostile work environment under Title VII.
The move followed a federal court ruling that vacated portions of the guidance relating to gender identity. Although the rescission reflected a change in agency policy, it did not eliminate all legal protections for transgender employees.
According to Michelle Phillips, an attorney with Jackson Lewis in White Plains, N.Y., employers should begin any discussion of workplace gender identity issues by understanding what has changed — and what has not.
“The Bostock decision from June of 2020 is still good law,” she explained. “So, if an employer [takes] an adverse action against someone based on their gender identity, that would still be protected.”
That distinction is critical. In Bostock v. Clayton County, the U.S. Supreme Court held that discrimination against employees because they are gay or transgender constitutes discrimination because of sex under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. While agencies may alter guidance documents or enforcement priorities, Supreme Court precedent remains the ultimate authority.
As a result, employers should be cautious about assuming that gender identity protections have disappeared simply because federal agencies have modified their guidance.
State Laws May Create Additional Exposure
Federal law, however, is only one piece of the compliance puzzle. Many states have enacted their own laws prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity, and those protections often operate independently of federal policy shifts.
“There are 22 states in which gender identity is protected,” Phillips said. “So, I think it’s important for the employer, as well as the employee, to look at where they are, and are there any protections outside of the executive orders and the EEOC’s rescission of the harassment guidance that could impact misgendering.”
For employers with remote or geographically dispersed workforces, this creates an added layer of complexity. A workplace practice that may not trigger scrutiny under federal enforcement priorities could still violate state or local anti-discrimination laws.
The result is a patchwork of obligations that requires employers to evaluate workplace policies carefully and remain aware of the laws that apply in each jurisdiction where employees work.
Federal Contractors Face Unique Considerations
Organizations that contract with the federal government may face additional compliance obligations.
“I think the first thing an employer needs to consider is whether they're a government contractor or not,” Phillips said. “Because the executive orders that deal with gender identity are all predicated on the employer being a federal contractor.”
Federal contractors have historically been subject to nondiscrimination requirements tied to executive orders and government contracting regulations. Because those requirements can change with presidential administrations, contractors should pay particular attention to evolving federal directives and consult legal counsel when necessary.
Civility Matters in Addition to Compliance
While compliance is important, employers should not reduce workplace interactions to a simple question of whether conduct is technically permissible.
Employment disputes often arise from patterns of behavior that employees perceive as disrespectful, dismissive, or hostile. Even when conduct does not result in legal liability, it can undermine morale, damage workplace relationships, and contribute to employee turnover.
Phillips noted that the law generally focuses on deliberate conduct designed to target or harm another individual.
“What the law is designed to protect is if someone intentionally, maliciously misgenders someone,” she said.
Yet from a management perspective, avoiding intentional misconduct should be viewed as the minimum standard — not the goal.
“You want a workplace where people can be who they are,” Phillips said.
That principle reflects a broader workplace objective that extends beyond compliance. Organizations that encourage respectful communication and professional conduct often experience stronger employee engagement, improved collaboration, and fewer workplace conflicts.
Simply put, civility is not only an ethical consideration, but a practical business strategy.
Balancing Respect and Personal Beliefs
Questions involving gender identity can sometimes intersect with employees' religious beliefs or personal convictions, creating difficult situations for employers. Courts continue to grapple with how anti-discrimination protections and religious freedoms should be balanced in workplace settings.
Even so, employers retain an obligation to maintain professional standards and prevent conduct that harms coworkers.
“Everyone has the right to their sincerely held religious beliefs,” Phillips said, “but the line that gets crossed would be when the expression of your opinion causes harm to another person.”
For employers, that observation may provide the most useful framework for navigating these issues. Respect for differing viewpoints does not require tolerating behavior that undermines workplace dignity or creates unnecessary conflict.
Was this resource helpful?
Validate your HR expertise
Earning your SHRM-CP credential makes you a recognized expert and leader in the HR field.
Related Content
Transform HR with mobile technology to streamline workflows, enhance communication, and boost employee engagement across distributed teams.
A new study found that talent development practitioners believe performance-based assessments are more effective at measuring employee learning outcomes than knowledge tests.
As AI makes deeper inroads into organizations, employee concerns about the technology continue to grow. Here's how HR leaders can address the fear of AI among their own staff, as well as in the wider organization.