AI is beginning to register at the macroeconomic level, even as its impact inside companies remains uneven. Productivity gains are showing up in growth data, while organizations struggle to translate investment into consistent returns. Individual adoption is rising faster than formal strategy, forcing a reset in expectations and accelerating policy intervention. This week's stories trace that gap from the economy down to governance.
1. Fed Chair Powell Credits Automation and AI for Economic Boom
What to Know:
After a quarter-point rate cut, Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, said strong productivity gains — driven in part by automation and AI — are supporting a "structural" expansion in the U.S. economy. The Fed upgraded its growth outlook, projecting 2.3% real GDP growth in 2026 and 1.7% for 2025, while expecting inflation to continue easing. Powell noted productivity growth above 2% even as the labor market softens, citing lower immigration and a shrinking working-age population. The Fed estimates payroll data may be overstating job growth by roughly 40,000 jobs per month. Powell said AI is not yet a dominant labor-market force but is contributing to efficiency gains that allow output to rise with fewer workers.
Why It Matters:
The Fed is beginning to treat AI-driven productivity as a macroeconomic factor. Strong output with weaker hiring complicates rate policy and signals a shift toward growth powered more by efficiency than labor.
Inside companies, the productivity story looks less settled.
2. AI Promised a Revolution. Companies Are Still Waiting.
What to Know:
Reuters reports that most companies are still struggling to generate meaningful returns from AI despite heavy investment. Surveys from Forrester and BCG show only 15% of executives saw margin improvement from AI last year, and just 5% report value at scale.
Many projects remain stuck in pilot phases, and companies are delaying planned AI spending into 2026. Firms cite inconsistent model performance, difficulty handling long or complex documents, and the need for extensive human oversight. High-profile examples from CellarTracker, Klarna, Verizon, and rail operator Cando show AI excelling at routine tasks but failing on nuance, judgment, and reliability. AI vendors are responding by embedding engineers with clients and focusing on narrower, workflow-specific deployments.
Why It Matters:
The gap between AI investment and realized value is widening. Progress is constrained less by model capability than by integration, data readiness, and human coordination. The next phase of adoption will favor targeted use cases over broad automation promises.
At the employee level, adoption is moving faster than enterprise rollout.
3. AI Use at Work Rises
What to Know:
Data shows workplace AI use continues to climb, with 45% of U.S. employees reporting they used AI at work at least a few times a year in Q3 2025, up from 40% the prior quarter. Frequent use rose from 19% to 23%, while daily use increased modestly from 8% to 10%. Adoption remains uneven: 76% of employees in technology roles use AI at least annually, compared with roughly one-third in retail, healthcare, and manufacturing.
Only 37% of workers say their organization has formally implemented AI, while 23% do not know, suggesting widespread informal or unsanctioned use. Employees primarily use AI to consolidate information, generate ideas, and learn new topics, with chatbots the dominant tool.
Why It Matters:
AI adoption is spreading faster at the individual level than at the organizational level. The gap between personal use and formal strategy increases governance risk and weakens learning at scale. Broader impact depends on whether firms move from ad hoc usage to coordinated deployment with managerial support.
That gap is driving a broader reset in expectations.
4. The Great AI Hype Correction of 2025
What to Know:
MIT Technology Review reports that 2025 marked a reset in expectations for generative AI after years of aggressive claims and uneven results. Surveys from the U.S. Census Bureau and Stanford show business adoption has stalled, with many projects stuck in pilot stages. Model releases continue, but recent launches such as GPT-5 delivered incremental gains rather than step-change advances.
The article argues that large language models perform well on specific tasks but generalize poorly compared to humans, limiting their ability to replace skilled workers. Studies citing low enterprise ROI often overlook widespread informal AI use by employees outside official programs. The moment reflects a correction in expectations, not a halt in AI progress.
Why It Matters:
The reset shifts attention from hype to execution. AI’s impact now depends on practical deployment, workflow redesign, and realistic expectations rather than breakthrough narratives.
Policymakers are now stepping in as the reset takes hold.
5. Trump Signs Order Blocking States from Enforcing Their Own AI Rules
What to Know:
President Donald Trump signed an executive order blocking U.S. states from enforcing their own AI regulations, arguing for a single national approach. The White House said the move would curb what it views as overly burdensome state laws, while allowing rules related to child safety. The order comes as more than 1,000 AI bills have been introduced at the state level, with roughly 100 regulations adopted this year across 38 states. Supporters say state-by-state rules threaten innovation and U.S. competitiveness; critics say the order removes state safeguards in the absence of federal law. (See California's response.)
Why It Matters:
The executive order concentrates AI authority at the federal level before national standards exist. It raises the stakes for forthcoming federal AI policy and limits states' ability to act in the interim.
Was this resource helpful?
Validate your HR expertise
Earning your SHRM-CP credential makes you a recognized expert and leader in the HR field.
Related Content
Learn how Marsh McLennan successfully boosts staff well-being with digital tools, improving productivity and work satisfaction for more than 20,000 employees.
The proliferation of artificial intelligence in the workplace, and the ensuing expected increase in productivity and efficiency, could help usher in the four-day workweek, some experts predict.
As artificial intelligence technology continues to develop, the demand for workers with the ability to work alongside and manage AI systems will increase. This means that workers who are not able to adapt and learn these new skills will be left behind in the job market.