People Leave Managers, Not Companies
While companies pour resources into benefits, flexible work policies, and culture initiatives, many overlook a key factor influencing employee retention and experience: leadership impact. According to Gallup’s State of the American Manager report, one in two employees has left a job at some point in their career to escape a manager and improve their quality of life.
This may reflect a systemic issue that can erode employee engagement, increase attrition, and ultimately undermine the organization’s performance.
This article explores ineffective leaders' tangible impact on the team and businesses and what organizations can do to build a future-ready pipeline of great managers.
Effects of Ineffective Management on Employee Retention
Ineffective management affects everything from employee well-being to business profitability. Managers account for a significant variance in employee engagement in different teams. The level of their leadership impact indicates that a manager's style doesn't just shape an individual's workday; it can significantly affect the quality of their personal life.
Leadership Impact on Employee Health
Employees who report to managers who may be unsupportive or untrained in recognizing their unique struggles, and therefore dismissive of them, often feel disengaged, underappreciated, and unmotivated. This emotional toll can drive stress and psychological instability (irritability, mental drain, etc.), which can spill into employees’ personal lives, impacting their well-being (sleep, loss of appetite, physical health) even after they've left work.
Meanwhile, spending heavily on wellness programs, health insurance, and engagement tools may dilute or negate organizational efforts if unsupportive people management isn't addressed as an urgent priority.
2. Leadership Impact on Organizational Health
The effect of poor management goes beyond disgruntled and disengaged employees. It is also apparent in their performance and productivity levels, which directly impact organizations.
Increased absenteeism may affect an organization's ability to function optimally.
Productivity levels may plummet, affecting entire teams.
Performance may suffer as error rates increase, and employees may show less enthusiasm about performing to their potential overall.
Decreased overall satisfaction with work may increase employee turnover rates.
Employee retention ability and organizational profitability may decline.
How Organizations Can Build a Pipeline of Great Managers
Excellent management—characterized by supportive and empathetic leadership behaviors—can effectively alleviate many of the unnecessary stressors in the workplace. However, great managerial talent is not particularly common. While some may have the inherent ability to manage effectively, others may only show basic aptitude. Organizations may prioritize identifying and nurturing exceptional managerial capacities as a long-term sustenance strategy.
1. Define what makes a great manager
Nurturing managerial talent requires defining what traits and abilities make a manager effective. Effective management essentially implies the ability to
Utilize employees’ natural talents and capacities: This involves assigning roles and responsibilities to which employees are most likely to excel.
Set clear expectations and priorities: Managers may lead two-way conversations with employees to set and prioritize expectations based on their bandwidth.
Ensure clear accountability: They may regularly monitor progress, provide performance reviews, and seek honest feedback.
Motivate individuals personally. Managers may provide the support and resources employees need to succeed, encourage autonomy, and recognize the incremental progress of their direct reports—all of which can drive intrinsic motivation in employees.
Build mutual trust through frequent, open conversations: Managers may have candid 1:1 conversations with team members to identify their struggles, listen attentively and empathetically, and provide emotional support.
2. Fix how organizations select managers.
Companies often promote their highest-performing individual contributors into managerial roles as a “reward” for their performance. Many others base this decision on the tenure of employees in their previous managerial roles.
However, excellence in an individual role or prior experience may not necessarily translate into managerial success. Organizations may overlook soft skills like relationship-building, ensuring accountability, and critical managerial talents.
Selecting managers may be approached with the same rigor as any mission-critical function that affects an organization’s long-term goals, such as employee retention.
Decouple promotions from tenure or individual performance.
When hiring or promoting individuals, assess leadership impact by factoring in soft skills like empathy, coaching, and conflict resolution.
Use validated tools to measure natural leadership potential.
Implement structured development programs for emerging leaders.
3. Develop managers continuously
Organizations must recognize that even managers with natural talent may require support and training, especially as expectations shift, practices evolve, and new technologies are introduced. Therefore, ongoing manager development may be viewed as a non-negotiable element of a company’s learning strategy to ensure positive leadership impact. This implies
Regularly training managers to ensure they adapt to changes and disruptions in the world of work—e.g., developing people skills to manage multigenerational workforces, remote employees, and underrepresented or disadvantaged workforce cohorts.
Facilitating peer learning cohorts or manager roundtables to ensure they're constantly aware and actively learning.
Encouraging feedback loops from employees (e.g., upward reviews) to improve management approaches and better support their direct reports.
Facilitating mentoring by senior leaders who model effective management to help managers grow in their careers.
4. Remedy manager engagement.
Managers, too, are prone to disengagement, often more than individual contributors. However, this reality is frequently overlooked, undermining leadership impact. Disengaged managers are less effective, more likely to burn out, and more prone to propagate disengagement across their teams. Therefore, investing in manager engagement is necessary and can lead to tangible business outcomes: higher employee retention, improved productivity, and a culture of coaching.
Organizations may prioritize manager engagement by taking concrete steps to understand and alleviate manager disengagement.
Measuring manager engagement rigorously and intervening with tools may support managers and drive re-engagement.
Understanding unique managerial challenges, including role overload, competing priorities, and lack of autonomy, can help prevent burnout.
Creating safe, regular forums for dialogue where managers can voice engagement challenges and personal struggles without fear of appearing ineffective.
5. Treat great managers as a strategic asset.
Great managers may be a key benefit in an employer brand's recruitment messaging. Companies may demonstrate their leadership development philosophy and publicize their managerial talent, highlighting how great managers can support growth, inclusion, and well-being. This can be especially powerful when competing for talent in a tight labor market, as high-performing candidates may gravitate towards companies with a reputation for strong, supportive leadership.
Leadership Impact on Employee Retention
In a talent economy, people don’t quit companies; they leave managers. People management is a massive part of effective management. Poor management undermines employee well-being, weakens business performance, and fuels turnover. Yet great managers do the opposite—they engage teams, foster loyalty, and drive results.
Organizations that ignore this truth may risk losing their best talent to companies that have built a culture of intentional, thoughtful leadership. On the other hand, organizations that invest in identifying, developing, and showcasing their skilled managers may position themselves to thrive.
Was this resource helpful?