Editor's note: Posts published on From the Workplace are written by outside contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SHRM.
Tuition reimbursement is the most common form of workplace educational benefit, offered by 57% of employers, according to the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans (IFFEB), but it consistently underperforms on its promise. U.S. corporations spend nearly $28 billion annually on tuition assistance, yet only 2% of eligible employees actually participate, according to research from Instride. Of those who express interest, just 25% ever start an application. Among employees who do enroll, 18% drop out before completing their degree, according to data from Gitnux, most often citing work-life balance as the reason. The benefit exists. The budget is approved. And still, the outcome falls short.
The problem isn't the money. It's the structure, or rather the lack of it.
No One Actually Owns Tuition Reimbursement
In most organizations, tuition reimbursement sits in a structural gray zone. HR oversees the benefit. A manager approves the request. But no one is accountable for what happens between enrollment and completion. There is no checkpoint, no support system, and no early warning when a sponsored employee starts to struggle.
Only 40% of working adults even know their employer offers a tuition reimbursement program, according to InStride. SHRM research shows employers would likely expand educational support if structural and tax incentives were better aligned. Yet participation gaps persist precisely because the internal structure that supports employees through completion is missing. The result is a benefit that functions as a checkbox rather than a strategic workforce investment.
What High-Performing Organizations Do Differently
The companies that see real return on investment (ROI) treat tuition reimbursement as a talent pipeline strategy, not a perk. Cigna's program yielded a 129% ROI, and Discover Financial Services saw 144% ROI through improved retention, both tied to structured support that extended well beyond the initial approval.
The U.S. Chamber Foundation identifies four essential questions every employer should ask about their tuition program, chief among them whether the benefit is aligned with the workforce strategy rather than offered as a perk. High-performing programs share three structural features: direct tuition payment rather than post-completion reimbursement, dedicated employee navigation support, and alignment between academic programs and role requirements. SHRM's advocacy of increasing the Section 127 tax-free tuition cap reflects a growing recognition that the current framework underserves both employers and employees.
The Employee Side of the Gap
Sponsored employees are juggling a full-time job, a graduate program, and the demands of everyday life, often without institutional support from either their employer or their academic institution. Many are first-generation graduate students or career changers for whom the academic environment feels foreign.
They enroll with ambition. They disengage under pressure. Yet when the benefit is structured and supported, the ROI can exceed 100%, as Cigna and Discover Financial Services both demonstrated. The gap is not motivation. It is infrastructure.
A Framework for HR Leaders
If your organization offers tuition reimbursement, ask these three questions:
1. Who is accountable for outcomes, not just the approval, but the completion?
2. What support exists between enrollment and graduation for employees struggling to balance work and academic demands?
3. How are you measuring ROI, and are completion rates part of that conversation?
Missing from most corporate tuition programs and the existing vendor landscape is a pre-enrollment assessment of individual program fit: Whether the sponsored employee has the academic readiness, research skills, and support structure to succeed before the first tuition check is written. Ensuring program-to-workplace alignment is necessary but not sufficient. The individual must also be set up to complete.
The answers will reveal structural gaps, and where a targeted intervention could turn your tuition benefit from a retention risk into a competitive talent advantage. According to IFEBP research, 92% of employers already offer some form of educational benefit. The infrastructure investment needed to make those benefits work is the missing piece.
Tuition reimbursement is not just a benefit. It is a workforce development investment. Treating it like one starts with accountability, and it starts before the first class begins.
Marj Atkinson, MLS, is the founder of Ask Marj The Research Sage, LLC, and a research librarian specializing in workforce education and graduate student success.
Was this resource helpful?
Validate your HR expertise
Earning your SHRM-CP credential makes you a recognized expert and leader in the HR field.
Related Content
Transform HR with mobile technology to streamline workflows, enhance communication, and boost employee engagement across distributed teams.
A new study found that talent development practitioners believe performance-based assessments are more effective at measuring employee learning outcomes than knowledge tests.
As AI makes deeper inroads into organizations, employee concerns about the technology continue to grow. Here's how HR leaders can address the fear of AI among their own staff, as well as in the wider organization.