NEW Professional Member Special>>> Save $20 and receive a SHRM tote bag
More companies are recognizing the importance of giving employees the time and space they need to navigate personal loss.
Save $20 on a New Professional Membership and receive a FREE Tote bag when you join SHRM today!
Learn to overcome challenges and meet your 2017 goals through competency-based HR education. Available in-person and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader. Join us in Phoenix, AZ | OCTOBER 2 - 4, 2017
Public supports drastic reductions but is divided on government action
Seventy-four percent of Americans believe that CEOs are paid too much relative to the average worker—even as they grossly underestimate the annual compensation of large-company CEOs, according to the report
Americans and CEO Pay: 2016 Public Perception Survey on CEO Compensation. The survey of 1,202 individuals was conducted across demographic groups by the Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University.
“There is a clear sense among the American public that CEOs are taking home much more in compensation than they deserve,” said David F. Larcker, a professor at Stanford Graduate School of Business, in a post on the school’s website. “While we find that members of the public are not particularly knowledgeable about how much CEOs actually make in annual pay, there is a general sense of outrage fueled in part by the political environment.”
The failure by big companies to make the case for high CEO pay could soon have greater consequences. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued a rule last year requiring U.S.-based publicly traded companies to disclose how median employee pay compares with CEO compensation—commonly known as
the CEO pay ratio. Employers will have to reveal this data for their first fiscal year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2017. After that, they must identify median worker wages once every three years—or more frequently if there is a significant change in their workforce or pay arrangements.
“Corporations and their boards need to do a better job explaining and justifying CEO pay arrangements,” said Nick Donatiello, lecturer in corporate governance at Stanford Graduate School of Business. “Clearly, companies have not been successful communicating how much value their CEO creates and how much compensation is required, given the market for talent, to attract and motivate the right people.”
Among the Sanford survey findings:
The average American grossly underestimates how much CEOs make.
Public frustration with CEO pay exists despite a public perception that corporate CEOs earn only a fraction of the actual disclosed CEO pay at
Fortune 500 companies. The typical American believes corporate CEOs earn $1 million in pay whereas median reported compensation for the CEOs of these companies is approximately $10.3 million, according to pay consultancy Equilar’s CEO Pay Strategies 2015 study, cited in the Sanford survey report.
Americans believe CEOs are overpaid relative to average workers.
Only 16 percent believe CEOs are paid an appropriate amount relative to the average worker. Responses remain largely negative across party affiliations: Only 25 percent of Republicans believe CEOs are paid the correct amount relative to the average worker, compared to 16 percent of Democrats and 11 percent of Independents.
Nearly two-thirds (62 percent) of Americans believe that there is a maximum amount that CEOs should be paid relative to the average worker, regardless of the company and its performance. The typical American would limit CEO pay to no more than six times that of the average worker. This figure is significantly below current pay multiples, which are approximately 210 times the average worker’s pay, based on Equilar’s compensation figures.
“CEO compensation figures are much higher than the public is aware of,” observed Larcker. “In many parts of the country, it is incomprehensible that anyone can earn this much money.”
“In many parts of the country, it is incomprehensible that anyone can earn this much money.”
Americans are suspicious about CEO pay for performance.
When respondents are given a hypothetical situation in which a company’s value increases by $100 million over the course of a year, the mean response on what the CEO should receive as compensation is 3.2 percent of the increase ($3.2 million). “This gets to the heart of the issue of ‘pay for performance,’” said Donatiello. “Either the public is not sold on the idea that CEOs should share in value creation to the extent that they do, or they do not believe that CEOs play an important role in value creation. Clearly companies need to make a stronger case for how pay is tied to performance—to the extent it is.”
Americans are split on whether the government should get involved.
In terms of a solution, approximately half of respondents (49 percent) believe the government should do something to change current CEO pay practices.
Those who favor government intervention support a range of possible actions:
“Public consensus is that there is a problem. There is much less agreement on a solution,” noted Brian Tayan, researcher at Stanford Graduate School of Business.
CEOs and Directors See Things Differently
A companion survey of 107 CEOs and directors of
Fortune 500 companies, also sponsored by Sanford’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance, found that corporate leaders believe that CEOs are paid the correct amount. As reported in
CEOs and Directors on Pay: 2016 Survey on CEO Compensation:
“When most directors think CEO pay is reasonable but most Americans believe that CEO pay is a problem, then you have a serious perception gap,” cautioned Donatiello.
Stephen Miller, CEBS, is an online editor/manager for SHRM.
Follow me on Twitter.
Related SHRM Articles
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies