Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
SHRM board member David Windley discusses how unconscious bias can derail workplace diversity efforts.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
To make business decisions or to provide sound advice to leadership requires proficiency in
Critical Evaluation. Key to exhibiting that competency is gathering information, including conducting analyses, recalling prior experiences and reviewing best practices. Not only do HR professionals collect data, they must illustrate its meaning. How is this accomplished?
Consider the HR metric of time-to-fill (TTF). TTF reflects the total number of days that lapse before an open position is filled. Generally, organizational leaders want TTF to be low. High TTF is associated with higher costs, overworked employees and decreased morale, which leadership may interpret as HR inefficiency. But TTF doesn't always tell the full HR story: The pool of candidates may not have the skill set required for the position, or an individual candidate may turn out to be a poor organizational fit.
[SHRM members-only network: Join the discussions on SHRM Connect]
While TTF is a useful metric, it is a single, independent data point; additional data should be considered to provide an overall context for what is happening in the organization. HR professionals must dig beyond the output to get to the outcome by using
Critical Evaluation effectively.
An output is tangible—a product, a status report, the completion of a project, a new service or training program. In the TTF example above, the output could be when a new hire starts and HR closes the requisition after, say, 26 days.
An outcome tends to be subjective and trickier to measure—it involves evaluating actions taken, changes in behavior or knowledge transfer. In the TTF example, outcomes could be the quality of hire, an increase in morale, or higher turnover as a result of cutting corners in the recruiting process.
What are some ways for HR professionals to focus more on evaluating outcomes rather than simply measuring outputs?
To sum up: The next time leadership urges you to have a new talent management system in place by the end of the quarter, with X and Y capabilities, or asks you why cost-per-hire increased from last year, invoke your
Critical Evaluation competency. Identify leading indicators of outcomes. Advocate for quality outcomes over abundant output. Build your goal-setting strategy; base it on appropriate actions, timelines and responsible parties.
Lindsay Northon, M.A., SHRM-SCP (@SHRMLindsay), is HR competencies specialist at SHRM.
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more.
Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Apply by March 23
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies