NEW Professional Member Special>>> Save $20 and receive a SHRM tote bag
More companies are recognizing the importance of giving employees the time and space they need to navigate personal loss.
Save $20 on a New Professional Membership and receive a FREE Tote bag when you join SHRM today!
Learn to overcome challenges and meet your 2017 goals through competency-based HR education. Available in-person and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader. Join us in Phoenix, AZ | OCTOBER 2 - 4, 2017
Employers promoted 9% of their employees during the past year; accompanying raises held steady
The percentage of employees receiving a promotion on an annual basis increased to 9 percent in 2014, up from 7 percent in 2010, according to a February 2015
Promotional Guidelines survey report from WorldatWork.
The survey, conducted in November and December 2014 among WorldatWork members—total rewards professionals working mostly for large North American firms—also assessed the standard pay increases that accompany promotions.
Promotional Pay Raises
The increase in the rate of employee promotions is “evidence that organizations are relaxing the purse strings for their pay budgets,” said Kerry Chou, WorldatWork senior practice leader and report author, in an e-mail to
SHRM Online. But only so much.
The report found, “There has been little change … in the average amount of increase that employees are receiving” when promoted, compared with prior surveys conducted in 2010 and 2012.
Salary Increases on Promotion
In 2014 (or the current fiscal year), what has been the average promotional increase expressed as a percentage of base pay, for each employee category in your organization?
Promotional Guidelines report
In determining promotion increase amounts, the most influential factors were:
• Pay range for a new position (cited by 71 percent of respondents).
• Rates paid to other employees similarly situated within the organization (60 percent).
To define employee movement as a “promotion” entitled to a pay raise, 77 percent of organizations required higher-level responsibilities and 75 percent required an increase in pay grade, band or level.
Budgeting for Promotions
While an increasing promotion rate is good news, “the data also suggests that employee vacancies are helping employers foot the bill for these promotions,” rather than increased salary budgets, Chou noted. For instance, when asked how their organizations fund salary increases for promotions, 29 percent of respondents said promotions were funded with vacancy savings—up by 7 percentage points since 2010, when 22 percent reported funding promotions with vacancy savings.
Less than half (42 percent) of organizations now budget separately for promotions, and “the prevalence of this practice appears to be falling as more organizations are either budgeting for promotions in their merit budget or simply funding with salary or vacancy savings,” Chou noted.
However, it would be wrong to conclude that organizations that don’t budget for promotions believe that career advancement isn’t important. In fact, “it’s quite common, especially for large companies with hundreds or thousands of employees, to have enough slack in their payroll due to vacancies to cover unbudgeted promotional costs,” said Chou.
“Not having a set line-item in a manager’s budget for promotions increases the chances that a promotion that does take place is truly deserved,” he explained. “An implicit message of having a line-item in a budget is ‘it’s there for you to spend,’ and some managers may promote staff simply because their budget allows it.”
Funding for Promotions
How does your organization fund promotional increases (check all that apply)?
Budget for promotional increases is separate from other pay increase budgets.
Promotional increases funded with vacancy savings (savings from vacant positions or during recruitment).
Promotional increases funded as part of our merit budget.
Promotional increases funded with salary savings (hiring at a lower rate).
Promotional increases funded out of merit budget, but the merit budget is not inflated to cover promotional increases.
Promotional increases funded out of another budget.
Promotional increases funded out of another budget, but the other budget is not inflated to cover promotional increases.
Promotional Guidelines report
Handling Merit Increases
When promoted employees have been in their new positions for less than a year, 33 percent of organizations make them eligible for the nearest annual merit increase—down from 46 percent in 2010, the survey found. Among other current practices, organizations are:
• Varying their practice by employee or manager, or as determined on a case-by-case basis (24 percent).
• Including the next merit increase in the promotional increase (16 percent).
• Making promoted employees eligible for a prorated merit increase (9 percent).
• Requiring promoted employees to wait until the next full-year merit cycle (7 percent).
• Not offering merit increases (2 percent).
Lack of Communication
Another issue organizations continue to struggle with is communication about promotion practices. Among survey respondents:
• 63 percent do not feature or market promotion opportunities or activities as a key employee benefit when attempting to recruit new employees.
• 46 percent do not proactively share promotion guidelines or policies with employees unless asked.
• 21 percent do not share promotion guidelines or policies with employees under any circumstances.
The failure to communicate about promotions appears to be short-sighted, as more than 60 percent of respondents also believe that opportunities for promotion have a positive or extremely positive effect on employee engagement and motivation, the survey found. Moreover, the perceived effect on employee engagement increases as the amount of information shared with employees about promotions increases.
Why are so many organizations not sharing their promotion policies? “As a practical matter, many tend to tread lightly in this area simply due to the fact that only a relatively small percentage of employees actually receive a promotion on an annual basis,” Chou explained. “So to the extent that employers are actively ‘promoting’ their promotion guidelines, it may produce an unrealized expectation on the part of some employees that more promotions will be awarded than actually are, which could become a source of dissatisfaction.”
Organizations that do the best job in communicating their promotion guidelines “include the criteria on which promotions are based, so it’s clear to employees that a promotion isn’t just handed out to anyone.”
Stephen Miller, CEBS, is an online editor/manager for SHRM. Follow him on Twitter
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies