Support through your toughest HR challenges: A network of 285,000 HR professionals.
Shawn Premer shows how doing the right thing for employees leads to positive business results.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
A new survey suggests the biggest cost of a bad hire might not be financial.
The majority of chief financial officers (CFOs) surveyed were most concerned about degraded staff morale (39 percent) and a drop in productivity (34 percent), according to a study released by global staffing firm Robert Half. Monetary costs came in third (25 percent).
The survey was based on interviews with more than 2,100 CFOs.
Ninety-five percent of respondents said a poor hiring decision at least somewhat impacts the morale of the team, with more than one-third (35 percent) saying morale is greatly affected.
“A bad hiring decision can often cause a negative ripple effect through the organization,” said Greg Scileppi, president of international staffing operations at Robert Half.
“Hiring a bad fit or someone who lacks the skills needed to perform well has the potential to leave good employees with the burden of damage control, whether it be extra work or redoing work that wasn’t completed correctly the first time,” he said. “The added pressure on top performers could put employers at risk of losing them, too.”
There are a number of reasons why someone may not be a good fit for a job, from a lack of requisite skills to a personality mismatch, said Paul McDonald, senior executive director for Robert Half. “Interviews and reference checks are designed to ensure a successful hire, but these methods are not fail-safe, particularly if employers are not thorough in their efforts,” he said.
Other findings from the survey include:
Making Bad Hires
Anyone working in the recruitment function for any length of time has made bad hires. The reason why?
“The process used in finding and selecting people is an inexact science at best,” said Ronald C. Pilenzo, SPHR, president & CEO of The Global HR Consultancy, based in Hobe Sound, Fla. We still do not have a foolproof system of selecting people for jobs, added Pilenzo, also the former president of the Society for Human Resource Management. “We have tried and still use a variety of methods ranging from an interview alone, interviews preceded by tests, reference checks, psychological assessments and more. The bottom line is that in the end, after all screening methods have been considered or applied, an individual judgment must be exercised on one finalist for each job.”
So why are hiring mistakes made? One issue is the lack of trust between HR and hiring managers, Pilenzo said. “The problem is that most hiring managers are not very good at interviewing and not trained in the selection process. Bad hires also occur when the hiring manager goes against the recommendations of the HR department,” he said.
Another issue is ignoring or misreading what has been learnt or observed about candidates. “Few applicants outright lie about their background and experience but most bend the truth by expanding their background, job experience, titles and education,” Pilenzo said. Background checks become very important. But the best way to get at the truth is by being able to ask the right questions, he said. “One way to assess a candidate’s resume is to have job applicants draw an organization chart and define how they fit into the chart, where their boss and the function is positioned, and how the work they do is processed and evaluated. In short, how does the work of a candidate, their department, a service or a product contribute to the organization?”
Roy Maurer is an online editor/manager for SHRM.
Follow him @SHRMRoy
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Talent Attraction Study: What Matters to the Modern Candidate
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies