This Month Only! >> $20 off and a FREE SHRM tote with your membership and code TOTE2018!
Sign up for free email newsletters and get more SHRM content delivered to your inbox.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
enjoyed reading “Your Cheating Heart” (June), but I am afraid the article may have painted too rosy a picture regarding the usefulness of integrity and personality tests to detect applicant deception.
Research suggests that roughly 30 percent of applicants fake their responses to integrity and personality tests (Griffith and Converse, 2011). So while less adept fakers are screened out of the applicant pool, integrity and personality tests are actually gateways for deceptive applicants to enter the organization. The most disturbing notion is that those who do successfully fake personality measures are more likely to engage in counterproductive work behaviors (Peterson et al., 2011). So when publishers of integrity and personality measures claim to be screening out deceptive applicants, we should be asking who is faking whom?
Richard GriffithMelbourne, Fla.
Thank you for your article regarding the use and practice of “integrity testing.” I was especially appreciative of your mention and treatment of “false positives.”
While I agree with valid testing, I am conflicted with the necessary oxymoronic position that was mentioned within the article, namely that if an applicant states that they have never stolen anything, a “too-good-to-be-true” response is triggered. While not perfect by any means, I find myself failing at least this question regarding integrity, due to the fact that I have never stolen anything—never. Potentially at least, the greater integrity an individual possesses, the lower he would score.
This simply highlights the challenge that HR practitioners face every day: to create not only processes and systems that evaluate and predict future behavior accurately but to reward, recognize and evaluate actions individuals have taken as well as those individuals themselves.
Sometimes too-good-to-be-true is just that, and sometimes it is simply true. The difficult part is knowing the difference.
Integrity testing, I believe, is effective en masse but could work against itself on an individual basis. As for me, I think I’ll plot my course to increasing my integrity score; lifting the next copy of
HR Magazine will at least move me up one category.
Thank you for your great magazine; it is indispensible.
Fred MillenAnchorage, Alaska
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Become a SHRM Member
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 10,000 companies