Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
Karin Hurt discusses workplace diversity, single motherhood and why being who you are at work matters.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Avoiding some Affordable Care Act requirements and fees may be a factor
A growing number of small and midsize employers are opting to self-insure their employee health plans, in part because self-insuring allows employers to avoid some—but by no means all—of the coverage mandates and administrative costs imposed by the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
While the data do not conclusively demonstrate that ACA is the reason for this shift, the findings "are consistent with the prediction that the ACA would cause more small- and midsized employers to adopt self-insured plans," said Paul Fronstin, health research director at the nonprofit Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) in Washington, D.C., and author of EBRI's July
report on self-insured health plan trends.
Employer-sponsored group health plans fall into two categories:
Among the new findings from the EBRI report, from 1996 to 2015 the percentage of U.S. private-sector employers offering at least one self-insured health plan rose from 28.5 percent to 39 percent.
From 2013 to 2015, the percentage of employers by size that offered at least one self-insured plan changed as follows:
Percentage of Private-Sector Employers that Self-Insure at Least One Plan, by Firm Size, 1996-2015
(Click on the graphic to view a larger version.)
"Key provisions of the ACA took effect in 2013, which is why the analysis focuses on the period between then and 2015," Fronstin noted. "These data are consistent with the perspective … that the ACA would cause more small and midsized employers to adopt self-insured plans."
The EBRI report draws on data from private- and public-sector employers collected by the U.S. Census Bureau for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Fewer Regulatory Burdens
One example of how the ACA can limit flexibility and drive up costs for small businesses involves "essential health benefits."
The ACA identifies
10 benefit categories that must be included as essential health benefits for fully insured
small-group market plans. But self-insured plans, along with coverage offered in the large-group market and through
grandfathered plans, are not required to cover each of these essential health benefits. (All plans, however, must still meet the ACA's requirements to provide "affordable" coverage that offers at least "minimum value.")
"When [self-funded arrangements are] properly designed, there are several ways an employer can 'win,' " noted Sean McGuire, CEO of E.D. Bellis, a benefits compliance and consulting firm in Omaha, Neb.,
in a recent online post. "Examples … include eliminating community rating, avoiding essential health benefit mandates required by the ACA and perhaps most importantly, the avoidance of adverse selection in the fully insured marketplace."
In addition, organizations that self-insure retain the claim reserves traditionally held by insurance companies and keep the interest on those reserves, McGuire said.
Beware Financial Risks
Bob Graboyes, senior fellow for health and economics at the National Federation of Independent Business, a small business advocacy group,
recently wrote that "With self-insurance, certain businesses save money in most years, losing money in the scattered years when some employees suffer major illnesses. For these businesses, self-insurance costs less over the long-run than do fully insured products. So some, but not all, businesses will find it advantageous to self-insure."
Striking a more cautious note, Robert Pozen, former chairman of MFS Investment Management,
warned that "For small businesses subject to the [ACA's] employer mandate, self-funding offers both great advantages and some treacherous disadvantages." Among the latter, Pozen noted that "Since stop-loss policies are issued on an annual basis without guaranteed renewal, an unexpected rise in the health care costs at a small firm can lead to much higher premiums the following year or an abrupt cancellation of the policy altogether."
He suggested that "a potentially crippling scenario for a small business is not far-fetched. Say an employee is diagnosed with an obscure type of cancer. He needs intensive therapy for two to three years at a cost of millions of dollars. The stop-loss insurer may pay for his care for one year then decline to renew the contract. No other reinsurer will take on the policy, so the employer gets stuck with the bill. For many small businesses, that would be financially devastating."
Related SHRM Article:
Small Businesses Are Dropping Health Coverage; Large Employers Hold Steady, SHRM Online Benefits, July 2016
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies