Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
Training, policies and tools to help HR prevent and respond to harassment claims.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Service providers challenging a denied benefits claim can be intimidating
Your daily routine is interrupted when the mailroom clerk drops a thick certified mail envelope on your desk. Inside that envelope is a dense, rambling and threatening 20-page demand letter from an attorney. The letter appears to be challenging the denial of a benefits claim under your company's group health plan. The amount claimed to be owed by the plan is wildly inflated compared to the value of the medical services and supplies that were actually or allegedly provided.
The demand letter contains a document signed by the health plan participant that purports to assign to an out-of-network medical provider the participant's benefits and legal rights, and also to appoint the out-of-network provider as the participant's "authorized representative" and "assignee" under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the plan.
The demand letter says that your "usual and customary rates" for paying out-of-network claims are invalid. With a generous sprinkling of boldface, underlines and ALL CAPS, the barely coherent demand letter purports to back up its spurious claims with a hodgepodge of sources, such as newspaper articles, lawsuits in faraway places and a 2008 investigation by the New York attorney general.
Situations like this have become all too common under employer-sponsored group health plans. A physician-owned, out-of-network health care service provider—such as an ambulatory surgery center or a sleep center—sends a demand letter to the plan administrator. The letter asserts an appeal of a denied benefits claim by one of the plan's participants; requests copies of a lengthy list of plan-related documents; and alleges that the plan administrator, the plan sponsor, the plan's third-party claims administrator, the insurance carrier and/or the plan itself have violated ERISA and other federal or state laws relating to plan administration or the participant's benefits claim.
Often, there is evidence that the out-of-network provider has waived some or all of the participant's portion of the charges otherwise payable for the health care services received, such as a waiver or reduction of the participant's required cost-sharing amount under the terms of the plan for deductibles, co-pays and co-insurance pertaining to the covered services.
What should you do when you receive this kind of shakedown letter? And more importantly, what should you be doing to avoid getting a letter like this in the first place?
How to Respond
Do not ignore the letter. ERISA imposes mandated timeframes for responding to benefit claims and appeals, as well as for responding to written requests from participants or their authorized representatives for certain plan-related documents that are required to be disclosed under ERISA.
Determine what defenses may be available to you. Do any of these possible defenses apply?:
Building Your Defense
To build a formidable defense against abusive out-of-network provider claims and billing practices, a plan sponsor could amend its group health plan in the following ways:
By including these and other preventative measures in the group health plan documents—such as the plan, summary plan description and employee communication materials—the plan administrator can go a long way towards inoculating the plan and the plan sponsor from the substantial cost and time commitment involved with having to defend against inflated claims made by unscrupulous out-of-network providers.
Brian Giovannini and Cathy Currie are attorneys in the Houston office of Haynes and Boone. Giovannini serves as advisor and benefits counsel to a diverse group of clients, from local governments to Fortune Global 500 corporations. Currie advises clients on employee benefits and executive compensation legal matters, and was previously in-house counsel for a large international engineering services company.
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more. Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Choose from dozens of free webcasts on the most timely HR topics.
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies