Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
HR professionals share their advice for minimizing worker stress and boosting retention.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Virtual SHRM-CP/SHRM-SCP Certification Prep Seminars kick off September 12 and fill up fast!
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader. Join us in Phoenix, AZ | OCTOBER 2 - 4, 2017
Employees want to ease into retirement. Why don't more employers let them?
Most Americans ages 61 to 66 who are still employed maintain a full-time work schedule. However, while about one-quarter of workers in this age group say they had planned to reduce their work hours as they transitioned to retirement, fewer than 15 percent subsequently reported that they were partially retired or were gradually retiring from their jobs, according to a new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).
The June report,
Older Workers: Phased Retirement Programs, Although Uncommon, Provide Flexibility for Workers and Employers, looks at employer-based programs in which older employees can reduce their working hours, often with a knowledge-transfer component that passes along their expertise to younger colleagues.
"As the large Baby Boomer generation retires, the workforce will lose much of their knowledge and experience," stated the report by Charles A. Jeszeck, the GAO's director of Education, Workforce and Income Security Issues. Encouraging phased retirement is one way to mitigate this loss, he noted.
However, formal phased retirement programs present design and operational challenges for employers, including compliance with provisions and laws related to discrimination. Despite these challenges, most employers that the GAO interviewed that have phased retirement programs found them beneficial.
A Range of Approaches
Employers most likely to provide formal phased retirement programs had larger or technical and professional workforces, and tended to be in fields such as education, consulting and high-tech, the GAO found. The report summarizes the phased retirement programs at eight such (unnamed) companies, showing a range of approaches.
For instance, in one employer's program:
At another employer's program:
[SHRM members-only toolkit:
Managing Flexible Work Arrangements]
Informal Programs More Prevalent
While formal phased retirement programs have not been widely adopted, more employers are offering informal or ad hoc programs, according to the Society for Human Resource Management's
2017 Employee Benefits survey report.
Source: Society for Human Resource Management's 2017 Employee Benefits survey report.
One reason employers are more likely to offer informal programs is that they prefer to limit phased retirement opportunities to high-performers and those with in-demand skills and believe that an ad hoc approach makes that easier, suggested Jack Towarnicky, who has held HR and benefits leadership positions at four
Fortune 500 companies, during a May 9 presentation at WorldatWork's Total Rewards conference in Washington, D.C.
An informal approach, however, "could pose legal issues regarding nondiscrimination based on who is offered the right to shift to part time, but this hasn't been tested" in the courts, said Towarnicky, who noted he was speaking for himself and not on behalf of any organization.
Employees' desire for phased retirement opportunities is growing, and eventually that will drive more employers to offer formal programs that they can use to attract and retain talent, Towarnicky said.
"Increasingly now and in the future, the lines between employment and retirement are going to become almost imperceptible," and HR will be challenged with finding ways to respond, Towarnicky noted, or older employees will depart with their knowledge and find organizations that will allow them to work fewer hours.
"If you're thinking that people are going to call it quits at 65, it's just not going to happen," Towarnicky remarked. "A lot of employers still have this full-stop concept. People end up having to leave the organization."
However, companies such as financial services firm S&T Bancorp are making concerted efforts to hire part-time retirees, he pointed out.
He also referenced Northern Arizona University's phased retirement program as an interesting model.
Working Longer and Its Consequences
A July report from Deloitte,
Navigating the Future of Work, found that "The prospect of older generations working for longer periods as their physical capability to remain employed improves could affect the pace at which younger talent and ideas renew organizations—and potentially intensify the intergenerational competition for jobs. It could also lead to a substantial increase in seniors participating in the 'gig economy,' out of post-retirement desire or necessity."
When putting phased retirement opportunities in place, employers must decide whether to maintain full health care and retirement plan benefits for those who are phasing into retirement—which is the approach most likely to keep older employees onboard.
Alternatively, they can classify program participants as part-time employees not entitled to group benefits, or provide a different benefit approach such as subsidies for program participants to purchase health care on the individual market or through public exchanges.
Organizations with defined benefit pension plans can permit near-retirees to reduce their hours worked and use partial distributions from their pension plans to make up for their reduced wages (IRS rules allow in-service distributions from defined benefit plans under certain circumstances.) Also, the salary component of the pension formula should be designed—or amended if necessary—so that, for instance, it is based on a plan participants' three consecutive highest-earning years, rather than their final three years of employment.
If choosing not to offer full benefits for phased retirees, organizations should keep close watch on these employees' hours to ensure their part-time status is maintained, Towarnicky said.
A Phased Retirement Disconnect
Employers recognize that their employees envision transitioning to retirement in a variety of ways, according to Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies
17th Annual Retirement Survey report, published in August.
Despite employers' recognition that many of their employees envision a flexible or phased transition into retirement, few have programs in place to support them:
Employers also are missing an opportunity to ensure smoother transitions when their employees do retire, the findings indicate: only 27 percent encourage employees to participate in succession planning, training and mentoring.
Related SHRM Articles:
Taking Phased Retirement Options to the Next Level,
SHRM Online Benefits, February 2017
Use Voluntary Benefits to Attract and Keep Part-Time Workers,
SHRM Online Benefits, July 2017
Early Retirement Health Care Quandary Keeps Workers on the Job,
SHRM Online Benefits, July 2017
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more. Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Eye Care: A Visible Contribution to a More Secure Retirement
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies
[/_catalogs/masterpage/SHRMCore/Main.master][Title][SHRM Online - Society for Human Resource Management]