Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
SHRM board member David Windley discusses how unconscious bias can derail workplace diversity efforts.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Guidance on the tax implications of combining wellness programs, voluntary benefits and cafeteria plans
Employers are being marketed various types of benefit arrangements that are designed to reduce the employer's tax obligations by using a combination of wellness programs, voluntary benefits and cafeteria plans. Not surprisingly, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has taken interest in these designs and has provided guidance that may dampen the enthusiasm for such arrangements.
IRS Chief Council Advice Memorandum 201622031, issued in May 2016, the IRS addressed the tax treatment of three different situations in which wellness benefits result in taxable income to employees.
Situation 1: The employer provides health coverage with a separate no-cost wellness program that provides health screenings and other services that generally qualify as a tax-favored accident and health plan under Internal Revenue Code section 106. Employees that participate in the wellness program may also earn cash rewards and other benefits that do not qualify as Code section 213(d) medical expenses, such as gym memberships.
Tax treatment: Those cash rewards are taxable income to the employee and subject to income tax withholding and employment taxes. Similarly, benefits not otherwise excludible from income, such as the payment of gym membership fees, are included in employee's gross income at fair market value and are also subject to income tax withholding and employment taxes.
Situation 2: The same as situation 1 except that to participate in the wellness program, employees pay pretax premiums through a Code section 125 cafeteria plan.
Tax treatment: The use of the cafeteria plan makes no difference as to the tax treatment of cash rewards and other benefits not excludible from income. They are taxable income subject to income tax withholding and employment taxes.
Situation 3: The same as above with the added wrinkle that the wellness program benefits include reimbursement of the wellness program premiums made by the employee.
Tax treatment: The IRS found that the reimbursements should be included in the employee's gross income and be subject to income tax withholding and employment taxes.
In January 2017, the IRS reviewed similar wellness plan arrangements in
IRS Chief Council Advice Memorandum 201703013. In that memo, the IRS addressed the tax treatment of fixed-indemnity cash payments paid by a wellness plan without regard to the amount of medical expenses incurred by the employee, where the employee is paying premiums to participate in the wellness program.
Fixed-indemnity plans pay a flat-dollar amount when certain health-related events occur, such as a hospital stay or a cancer diagnosis.
If the premiums are paid on a pretax basis through a Code section 125 cafeteria plan, any amounts paid by the plan are included in the employee's gross income and subject to income tax withholding and employment taxes. Of course, this raises the administrative issue of how the employer is to account for the taxes if the payments are from the third-party insurance carrier.
[SHRM members-only toolkit: Designing and Managing Wellness Programs]
Key Employer Takeaway
Note, though the Chief Counsel Advice Memoranda cannot be used or cited as precedent, they do provide useful insight into the IRS's interpretation of the law. Accordingly, employers being marketed these or similar arrangements should take care that the offered program comports with this IRS guidance.
Keith A. Dropkin is a principal in the White Plains, N.Y., office of Jackson Lewis P.C.
© 2017 Jackson Lewis. All rights reserved. Reposted with permission.
IRS Addresses Tax Treatment of Fixed-Indemnity Health Plans and Wellness Double Dip, Conduent, April 2017
IRS Issues Warning on Tax Treatment of Wellness Program Rewards, Carlton Fields, May 2017
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more.
Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Become a SHRM Member
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies