Editor's note: Posts published on From the Workplace are written by outside contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SHRM.
Many organizations invest significantly in leadership development, yet leaders often struggle when assuming roles during times of change. The challenge is not effort or intent, but timing. Leadership programs often address current gaps, as organizations evolve toward future needs. By the time the organization delivers leadership development, the business context may have shifted, leading to costly misalignment between leader preparation and current expectations.
This is the development paradox: Organizations prepare leaders for the present, while operating in the future. Unlike traditional development challenges, this gap is not about quality, but about timing and alignment with future business needs.
When Leadership Development Falls Out of Sync
Consider a common scenario: An organization launches a leadership program aligned with its current strategy, only to face a merger, restructuring, or rapid scaling shortly after. Participants gain new frameworks and confidence, but the business changes before those capabilities can be fully applied. As a result, the program’s content no longer reflects the organization’s reality.
Leaders are not ineffective; they are misaligned.
This pattern highlights a broader issue in talent strategies. Research from Gartner shows that only 24% of HR leaders believe their leadership development programs effectively build future leaders, underscoring the gap between development efforts and evolving business needs.
Leadership Capability Must Evolve with the Business
Organizations progress through stages such as startup, scaling, stabilization, and transformation, each requiring a distinct leadership approach.
- Leaders who excel in ambiguity may struggle with structure and scale.
- Leaders effective during growth may find it challenging to shift toward long-term strategy and culture building.
- Leaders who succeed in stable environments may face challenges during transformation.
These gaps are often mistaken for performance issues when they are development mismatches. Many leadership programs use static competency models instead of aligning development with the organization’s direction. As a result, pipelines may look strong on paper but fail in practice.
A More Forward-Looking Approach to Leadership Development
To address this gap, leadership development must shift from a reactive to a predictive approach. HR leaders play a critical role in anticipating business shifts and aligning leadership development accordingly.
Four practical shifts can help:
- Design for the next constraint, not the current state. Most organizations build development around their current performance gaps. More effective organizations ask, “What will break at the next stage of growth, and who needs to lead through it?” Development is anchored to that future pressure point.
- Evaluate how leaders unlearn, not just how they learn. HR professionals often emphasize learning agility, but what differentiates leaders is their ability to let go of approaches that previously made them successful. The risk is not a lack of capability, but over-reliance on past success.
- Use the business as the development platform. Organizations do not build leadership capability in isolation. Instead of separating development from execution, organizations embed leaders in real transformation work where stakes, ambiguity, and accountability are present.
- Make future misalignment visible early. Most organizations assess performance in the present and discover misalignment too late. More effective systems surface signals earlier, identifying where a leader’s current approach may not scale or translate to future demands.
These approaches align with SHRM guidance on leadership development and workforce planning, which emphasizes preparing leaders for continuous change rather than fixed roles.
The Strategic Opportunity for HR
Misalignment between leadership capability and organizational direction is often underestimated, yet it has a significant impact. For HR leaders, this translates into delayed execution, increased turnover risk, and reduced return on development investments. Organizations that address this gap gain a meaningful advantage by building leadership pipelines that remain relevant through change and fostering cultures where adaptation is expected, not reactive.
The key question for HR leaders is not whether development is occurring, but whether it aligns with the organization’s direction. Are organizations developing leaders to face today's challenges? The answer may determine whether leadership development serves as a support function or a strategic differentiator. In many cases, leadership failure is not a lack of capability, but a mismatch between what the business has developed and what the business now requires.
Dalia Morillo is the Senior Director of People Experience at Day One Agency, with more than a decade of experience leading global talent and organizational strategy.
Was this resource helpful?
Validate your HR expertise
Earning your SHRM-CP credential makes you a recognized expert and leader in the HR field.
Related Content
Transform HR with mobile technology to streamline workflows, enhance communication, and boost employee engagement across distributed teams.
A new study found that talent development practitioners believe performance-based assessments are more effective at measuring employee learning outcomes than knowledge tests.
As AI makes deeper inroads into organizations, employee concerns about the technology continue to grow. Here's how HR leaders can address the fear of AI among their own staff, as well as in the wider organization.