New Member Promotion Ends 9/30 >>> Save $15 and get a SHRM tote!
Employers are offering creative perks to attract and retain today’s workers.
Plus all the HR resources you need to be more efficient and effective this fall!
Prepare for your exam with the guidance of a SHRM-certified instructor in Boston, Oct. 24-26.
Learn how to make the business case for diversity, October 25-27.
Volunteerism—an aspect of corporate social responsibility (CSR)—has been increasingly on the radar of organizations and for good reason. Studies show that volunteerism can positively impact employee engagement, particularly among the important Geneneration Y demographic. A 2011 Deloitte Volunteer IMPACT survey indicated that if Millennials frequently participated in company-sponsored volunteer programs, then they were more likely to feel a strong connection and sense of belong at work.
But, while volunteering sounds good in principle, in practice there can be some pitfalls that HR leaders need to be aware of. Chief among them is ensuring that the activities are truly voluntary, especially if the employer is not paying employees to participate.
Risks of Volunteerism
John Cardella is executive vice president of human resources at Ceridian, a human capital management provider. “Few employees want to work for organizations that do not respect their people, community or environment,” said Cardella. “Many grads and job seekers from all different disciplines now make an organization’s corporate social responsibility and its support for volunteerism part of their decision-making when choosing an employer.”
Employees feel a sense of pride and excitement when they participate in volunteer activities, he said. “This truly helps employees to stay refreshed and wanting to do more for both the organization and the community.”
Still, he acknowledged, there are potential pitfalls that may emerge when it comes to engaging employees in volunteer opportunities if the process isn’t handled effectively. These can include:
The greatest risk for employers centers around the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), warns Donna Ballman, an employment attorney and the author of Stand Up For Yourself Without Getting Fired (Career Press, 2012). An employer can’t require an employee to “volunteer,” she said. “Let’s say a company organizes a disaster relief effort and asks for employees to volunteer to help out. If getting involved is truly voluntary, then that’s okay. But, once it’s required, the employee is no longer a volunteer,” she said. “Companies sometimes get so caught up in pushing employees to get involved that they cross this important line.”
A related risk for for-profit companies, added Ballman, is that there is no such thing as “volunteering” for a for-profit. “If the company ‘suffers or permits’ an employee to work, [the employee has] to be paid at least minimum wage.” This issue has emerged recently related to the use of unpaid interns.
“Organizations need a program around volunteerism so employees and management understand what to expect,” said Cardella. “Without it there may be risk for the employee for having taken too much time off.” Having a policy or process helps to clarify expectations.
Veena Iyer is a labor and employment attorney with Nilan Johnson Lewis in Minneapolis. Iyer stresses the importance of addressing critical issues—like whether the activity will be paid or unpaid—upfront, and carefully communicating and documenting these decisions. “Employers need to be thoughtful about making the distinction between something that is clearly voluntary and something that is really ‘highly encouraged,’ in which case you need to think that it’s probably not voluntary.”
One way for employers, and HR professionals, to think about this is considering the ultimate goals of employees’ participation. If the primary goal is around team-building, which many volunteer activities are, there’s a benefit to the organization which suggests employees should be paid. If, on the other hand, the organization wants to support employee interest in a particular activity by organizing their participation—but not requiring participation—it may be truly voluntary.
“If the employer thinks, ‘This is a worthwhile cause and we’d love to have as many people form our organization get involved, but it’s not essential to our organization that they do it,’ that’s where you say we don’t necessarily need to be paying individuals,” said Iyer.
These are grey areas, she says, and it’s more a matter of minimizing than eliminating risk.
Ultimately, though, most employers agree that the benefits of well-managed volunteerism programs can outweigh the risks and many are being recognized for their efforts.
Nicole Stein is vice president, community responsibility and Barbara Baker is executive vice president, cultural enhancement at Umpqua Bank, with branches in Oregon, Washington and San Francisco. Umpqua has implemented a Connect Volunteer Network, which has become a nationally-recognized program that provides associates with paid time off each year (40 hours for full-time and 20 hours for part-time staff) to serve at youth-focused organizations, schools and community development programs.
They offer some insights for HR professionals to keep in mind when building an employee volunteer program:
At Umpqua, associates continually rank the program as one of their most valued employee benefits. The organization believes that this has been a key factor in their inclusion on FORTUNE Magazine’s list of the country’s “100 Best Companies to Work For” for the past seven years.
Lin Grensing-Pophal is a freelance writer in Chippewa Falls, Wis.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
The application deadline is October 21
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies