New to HR? Templates, tools and development to make you a seasoned pro in no time.
Shawn Premer shows how doing the right thing for employees leads to positive business results.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
But are they right for your company?
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
Most U.S. multinational companies follow the balance sheet approach when it comes to paying workers who are living abroad, but many companies are finding it cost-effective to use "local-plus" policies instead.
Under the balance sheet approach, expatriates stay on their home-country payrolls and retain the same salary and benefits. They generally receive allowances to compensate them for a higher cost of living in the host country, housing assistance, hardship allowances if applicable, increased tax liability on company source income, as well as educational assistance for any school-age children.
However, local-plus policies are becoming more popular as an alternative.
Under a local-plus approach, transferees receive a salary based on the host-country salary structure, plus additional allowances that can include housing assistance and educational assistance for children. Transferees generally do not remain on their home-country benefits plans. In general, the "plus" elements vary considerably by company and location.
For example, a local-plus package for a U.S. employee transferred to Singapore is likely to be quite different than one for an employee transferred to the United Kingdom. In many cases, local-plus packages are determined by negotiations between business leaders and prospective assignees.
Local-plus packages are sometimes seen as the "magic elixir" of expatriate compensation because they can strike a balance between local packages and expensive expatriate packages.
However, differences in host-country conditions make these policies a challenge.
Local-Plus Policies Beneficial for Some
The balance sheet approach is still by far the primary method for assignments of a limited duration, but mobility patterns have changed with an increased number of locally hired foreigners, one-way indefinite international transfers and early career development assignments.
Mercer's 2016 Local Plus and Location Specific Survey, which polled 110 global companies, showed that 47 percent of respondents already have policies for local-plus assignments.
Based on the survey results, the most common assignment locations for local-plus policies are the Asia Pacific region and the U.S., with large numbers of local-plus assignments also found in United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom. Many employers in financial services, technology, and engineering and construction have local-plus policies, with far less prevalence among energy and manufacturing companies.
The local-plus approach is also infrequently used for assignments to most third-world countries, except in cases where employees are being transferred from another such country.
Reasons for Popularity of Local-Plus Approach
North American participants in Mercer's survey were asked why they introduced these policies. Market competitiveness was cited by 55 percent of participants. Another critical factor was cost reduction, regarded by 54 percent of participants as the key driver behind local-plus policies.
Often, they're less expensive than the balance sheet approach. Sometimes they're not.
Sending a U.S. expat to Switzerland to earn a local Swiss salary plus receive housing assistance and education support, for example, would almost certainly be costlier than using a balance sheet package because of the high Swiss salaries.
It is important to determine the type of country where the local-plus approach may be feasible. Three main scenarios need to be considered:
Critical Issues with Local-Plus Policies
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Talent Attraction Study: What Matters to the Modern Candidate
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies