A U.S. Supreme Court case this term could significantly alter the landscape for HR professionals by expanding the president's authority to remove members of independent agencies. This could lead to more frequent policy shifts affecting the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
The case, Trump v. Slaughter, stems from President Donald Trump's removal of FTC Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter for policy disagreements. Slaughter sued, arguing her removal was unlawful because the FTC Act permits removal only for "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office."
Her case relies on the 1935 Supreme Court precedent, Humphrey's Executor v. United States, which established that Congress could constitutionally restrict the president's removal power for officials of independent agencies like the FTC.
The Supreme Court is now re-examining whether these removal protections are constitutional and if Humphrey's Executor should be overruled. The court's recent decisions have shown skepticism toward the concept of "independent agencies," suggesting a potential shift in its long-standing precedent.
A ruling that broadens the president's removal powers would mean that the leadership and priorities of agencies such as the EEOC and the NLRB could change more rapidly with each new administration. Who leads these agencies has a direct impact on their enforcement priorities.
The U.S. Supreme Court's upcoming decision on the president's removal powers is just one workplace compliance development. Here are other recent compliance trends and news.
IRS Announces 401(k) Contribution Limit for 2026
The 2026 retirement limits and thresholds have been unveiled by the IRS just hours after the federal government shutdown ended.
Certification Does Not Place a Cap on Intermittent FMLA Leave
A 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling clarified Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) protections. Medical certification of leave didn't cap a worker's unforeseeable intermittent leave, the federal appeals court held.
Workers Passed Over for Unadvertised Jobs Allege Age Bias
An employer that fails to advertise positions can wind up facing age discrimination claims. Learn how HR leaders can protect organizations from legal risks.
Was this resource helpful?